-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On 12 Jul 2000, Marc Horowitz wrote:
> In the case of monitoring an individual's email, it would be
> sufficient to monitor their spool file on whatever ISP mail server
> stores their mail. The spool file only contains one person's email,
> and only the ISP ne
On Wed, 12 Jul 2000, David Honig wrote:
> For $500/monthly you too can have a box in various NAPs. You can
> run your NIC in Bill Clinton mode, e.g., to measure certain
> things about traffic. I know of a corporation doing this (they
> are only interested in infrastructure traffic, not content
David Honig wrote:
>
> At 10:58 AM 7/12/00 -0400, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
> >>There's been speculation about NSA black boxes in such facilities for
> >>years. The FBI, however, isn't quite as "above the law" as the NSA likes
>
> For $500/monthly you too can have a box in various NAPs. You can
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Wed, 12 Jul 2000, Jeffrey I. Schiller wrote:
> I suspect that the reason they would want Carnivore as opposed to
> looking at spool files is that it is less invasive then looking at spool
> files, isn't dependent on the technology choices made by the ISP and
Jeffrey Schiller asked:
>
> I wonder how we find out more (FOIA), the descriptions I have heard so
> far (its a sniffer) seems a bit onerous. Big Brother at his best!
At least one group I know of has filed a FOIA for details. Perhaps we'll get
information in a few weeks. Or maybe they will just
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Wed, 12 Jul 2000, Rodger, William wrote:
> Meyer wrote:
> >
> > I guess this explains the FBI's opposition to the Verio
> > merger. I wonder
> > if a colocation company or service provider could be forced
> > to disclose
> > its participation in the Carni
I had posted a note saying that pen register usage in New York was
barred by the courts unless a wiretap warrant had been issued. I need
to update that posting.
First, that opinion was rendered in People vs. Bialostok, 80 NY2d 738,
http://www.law.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/nyctap.cgi?80+738 But it
moochers
!2713 NIST threatens antitrust against potential crypto patent moochers
But first, I have decided to file an opposition to the trademark application
for the phrase "patent busters". I just mailed off a request for an
extension in time to file a formal opposition reques
