At 10:08 PM 9/13/00 -0700, Bram Cohen wrote: >On Thu, 14 Sep 2000, Enzo Michelangeli wrote: > > > http://www.the-times.co.uk/news/pages/sti/2000/09/10/stinwenws01007.html > > > > SOLDIERS are having to use insecure mobile phones to communicate in > > battlefield exercises because, they say, the army's radio > > communications system is so unreliable. Senior commanders be-lieve > > that the reliability of mobile phones outweighs the increased risk of > > conversations being intercepted. > >Wouldn't it be ironic if they resort to buying a bunch of stariums ... I would suspect that they already buy a version of the device below: http://www.motorola.com/GSS/SSTG/ISSPD/Secure_Telecom/CipherTAC.html Paul
- Oh for a decently encrypted mobile phone... Enzo Michelangeli
- Re: Oh for a decently encrypted mobile phone... Bram Cohen
- Re: Oh for a decently encrypted mobile phon... Greg Rose
- Re: Oh for a decently encrypted mobile ... William Allen Simpson
- Re: Oh for a decently encrypted mob... Eric Blossom
- Re: Oh for a decently encrypted mobile phon... Paul Lambert
- Re: Oh for a decently encrypted mobile phon... Arnold G. Reinhold
- Re: Oh for a decently encrypted mobile ... Kevin Blanchard
- Re: Oh for a decently encrypted mobile phone... John Kelsey
- Re: Oh for a decently encrypted mobile phon... Jan Haar
- Re: Oh for a decently encrypted mobile phon... Kevin Blanchard
- RE: Oh for a decently encrypted mobile phone... Trei, Peter
- Re: Oh for a decently encrypted mobile phone... ji
- Re: Oh for a decently encrypted mobile phon... Sampo A Syreeni