Re: (Reciprocal)^2 (was Re: @NY Vol. 4, No. 28)

1999-03-14 Thread Matt Crawford
The terse description sounds like DIVX all over again!

(Reciprocal)^2 (was Re: @NY Vol. 4, No. 28)

1999-03-13 Thread Robert Hettinga
Bill's probably going to lose his lunch-money on this one. Either the copy protection is hacked by cypherpunks for grins :-), or more likely, artists, even the record companies themselves, will bypass it because they will have a cash-settled auction market, paradoxically of sufficiently *small* e