Re: Bernstein Delay Motion

1999-10-20 Thread John Gilmore
[Perry, I don't know if this is worth the list's time, we're getting into minutiae...zap it if you agree.] [Nah, I think its of interest. --Perry] > On a more serious note, when Patel issued Bernstein III, I seem to > recall a quote where she admonished the government for changing the > regula

Re: Bernstein Delay Motion

1999-10-19 Thread Marc Horowitz
John Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> It is possible that the revised regulations will not materially >> change the treatment of source code. But it is also possible >> that the revised regulations will alter the treatment of source >> code in ways that could have a bearing on the constitu

Bernstein Delay Motion

1999-10-19 Thread John Young
Thanks to Cindy Cohn we offer the USG's motion yesterday to delay en banc reargument in Bernstein: http://cryptome.org/bernstein-mot.htm A quote: "The revisions being implemented by the Department of Commerce entail extensive changes in the existing terms of the encryption export regulatio