bram wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Oct 1999, Robert Hettinga wrote:
>
> > "Lie in X.509, Go to Jail", pt. 2
> >
> > [snip]
>
> I don't don't understand what the big deal is - fraud is fraud, even if
> it's in plaintext email. Making digital signatures have the same legal
> staatus as physical signatures
On Wed, 20 Oct 1999, Robert Hettinga wrote:
> "Lie in X.509, Go to Jail", pt. 2
>
> [snip]
I don't don't understand what the big deal is - fraud is fraud, even if
it's in plaintext email. Making digital signatures have the same legal
staatus as physical signatures doesn't change that at all.
-
"Lie in X.509, Go to Jail", pt. 2
Cheers,
RAH
--- begin forwarded text
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 20:58:00 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: IP: [FP] California inaugurates digital signatures - cnn.com
FORWARDED:
--
From: "ScanTh
