Re: Legal/patent analysis of Lucre?

James Donald writes: > What is wrong with the original solution proposed in my original > article, > > The client uses an existing used coin for blinding the newly created > coin, preferably a coin that he got from someone else, not a coin > issue

Re: Legal/patent analysis of Lucre?

"James A. Donald" wrote: > > -- > At 10:23 AM 2/18/00 +, Ben Laurie wrote: > > A problem with continued development of Lucre is that various > > solutions to the coin marking problem have been proposed, and > > various opinions as to the likely patent-infringment-ness have been > > given,

Re: Legal/patent analysis of Lucre?

-- At 10:23 AM 2/18/00 +, Ben Laurie wrote: > A problem with continued development of Lucre is that various > solutions to the coin marking problem have been proposed, and > various opinions as to the likely patent-infringment-ness have been > given, leaving me no clearer as to what the be

Re: Legal/patent analysis of Lucre?

At 10:23 AM 02/18/2000 +, Ben Laurie wrote: >A problem with continued development of Lucre is that various solutions >to the coin marking problem have been proposed, and various opinions as >to the likely patent-infringment-ness have been given, leaving me no >clearer as to what the best way t

Legal/patent analysis of Lucre?

A problem with continued development of Lucre is that various solutions to the coin marking problem have been proposed, and various opinions as to the likely patent-infringment-ness have been given, leaving me no clearer as to what the best way to proceed is. Is there anyone out there willing and