"Phillip Hallam-Baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>I think you are probably refering to Ron's paper in FC'98. I presented an
>alternative and somewhat radical architecture at RSA'99 which demonstrated
>that it was practical to distribute revocation info in real time for a
>population of 5 billio
>Technically speaking it's not really supported by X.509 either because
CRL's
>don't really work (see for example the FC'99 proceedings for more details
on
>this, along with suggestions on how to fix it).
I think you are probably refering to Ron's paper in FC'98. I presented an
alternative and so
