Re: RSA Test

1999-03-11 Thread Arnold G. Reinhold
At 8:25 AM + 3/11/99, Adam Back wrote: >Eric Rescorla writes: >> Vin McLellan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >If you are waiting for NIST to offer the sort of full crypto module >> > validation tests that are offered to provide assurance for the >>DSA/Fortezza >> > version of FIPS-186(a),

Re: RSA Test

1999-03-11 Thread Adam Back
Eric Rescorla writes: > Vin McLellan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > If you are waiting for NIST to offer the sort of full crypto module > > validation tests that are offered to provide assurance for the DSA/Fortezza > > version of FIPS-186(a), don't hold your breath. > > I'm not. I'd simply

Re: RSA Test

1999-03-03 Thread Enzo Michelangeli
-Original Message- From: EKR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thursday, March 04, 1999 1:18 AM Subject: Re: RSA Test >Uh, no, definitely. You need (1) a good PRNG and (2) a reasonable >primality tester. These are both tricky. Especially the PRNG. BTW, a paper contributed to th

Re: RSA Test

1999-03-03 Thread EKR
Vin McLellan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Eric Rescorla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >There's more to correctly implementing RSA than simply > >correctly implementing PKCS-1. Consequently, PKCS-1 test > >vectors don't do the whole job. > > Well, maybe. Uh, no, definitely. You nee

Re: RSA Test

1999-03-03 Thread Vin McLellan
Eric Rescorla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >There's more to correctly implementing RSA than simply >correctly implementing PKCS-1. Consequently, PKCS-1 test >vectors don't do the whole job. Well, maybe. Over the past couple of years, however, the work of Bob Silverman of RSA Labs s

Re: RSA Test

1999-03-02 Thread EKR
Vin McLellan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hani Almansour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> queried the Listocracy: > > >I have implementation for RSA, SHA, MD5 and I want to test it. is there a > >fast way to test the output of any one of these encryption or if there is a > >program that test the output

Re: RSA Test

1999-03-02 Thread Vin McLellan
Hani Almansour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> queried the Listocracy: >I have implementation for RSA, SHA, MD5 and I want to test it. is there a >fast way to test the output of any one of these encryption or if there is a >program that test the output. Eric Rescorla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and

Re: RSA Test

1999-02-23 Thread EKR
ome with test vectors, so the easiest way is to run them and compare the test vectors. I've never seen any RSA test vectors, but it should be easy to cons some up with SSLeay or the like. -Ekr -- [Eric Rescorla [EMAIL PROTECTED]]

SHA-1 bitwise test vectors (Re: RSA Test)

1999-02-23 Thread Jim Gillogly
"Hani Almansour" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have implementation for RSA, SHA, MD5 and I want to test it. is there a > fast way to test the output of any one of these encryption or if there is a > program that test the output. For the basic SHA-1 and MD5 you can use the test vectors published

RSA Test

1999-02-23 Thread Hani Almansour
hi, I have implementation for RSA, SHA, MD5 and I want to test it. is there a fast way to test the output of any one of these encryption or if there is a program that test the output. thanks in advance for any help Hani.