Re: Slow revocation checks (was: X.BlahBlah...)

2000-03-06 Thread Peter Gutmann
lcs Mixmaster Remailer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >Peter Gutmann writes: >>The reason why revocation checking is disabled by default is a pragmatic >>one, in practice it acts as a "Delay processing each message by a minute >>or two" facility (or at least it did a year or so back), so by disablin

Slow revocation checks (was: X.BlahBlah...)

2000-03-06 Thread lcs Mixmaster Remailer
Peter Gutmann writes: > The reason why revocation checking is disabled by default is a pragmatic > one, in practice it acts as a "Delay processing each message by a minute > or two" facility (or at least it did a year or so back), so by disabling > it by default the vast masses (who don't know or