just received from IP
cheers
From: Susan Landau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: June 13, 2006 10:35:37 AM EDT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: report on security risks of applying CALEA to VoIP
Tuesday 13 June 2006 at 10:35
Below you'll find an executive summary of "Se
via Bruce Schneier's blog:
http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/nistpubs/800-90/SP800-90_DRBG_June2006.pdf
--
Perry E. Metzger[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe c
OK, after various queries I figured out that the page has moved and I
was being screwed up by cached data or something. The correct URL for
the 802.11 time lines web page is
http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/11/Reports/802.11_Timelines.htm
Sorry,
Donald
-Original Message-
From:
David Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The specification is secret and confidential. It uses the SMS4
> block cipher, which is secret and patented. [*]
"Secret" and "patented" are mutually exclusive.
--
Ben Pfaff
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: http://benpfaff.org
-
On 6/14/06, Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
David Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The specification is secret and confidential. It uses the SMS4
> block cipher, which is secret and patented. [*]
"Secret" and "patented" are mutually exclusive.
--
Ben Pfaff
For the uspto, yes. For si
| > The specification is secret and confidential. It uses the SMS4
| > block cipher, which is secret and patented. [*]
|
| "Secret" and "patented" are mutually exclusive.
Actually, they are not. There is a special provision in the law under
which something submitted to the patent office can be d
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006 12:33:46 -0700, Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The specification is secret and confidential. It uses the SMS4
> > block cipher, which is secret and patented. [*]
>
> "Secret" and "patented" are mutually exclusive.
Perha
