* Ian Farquhar:
> Crypto has been an IP minefield for some years. With the expiry of
> certain patents, and the availability of other unencumbered crypto
> primitives (eg. AES), we may see this change. But John's other
> points are well made, and still valid. Downloadable MP3 ring tones
> are a
On 7/8/07, Joshua Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, Jul 07, 2007 at 10:53:17PM -0600, Darren Lasko wrote:
> 1) Can a product obtain FIPS 140-2 certification if it implements a PRNG
> from NIST SP 800-90 (and therefore is not listed in FIPS 140-2 Annex C)? If
> not, will Annex C be updated
re:
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/aadsm27.htm#39 a fraud is a sale, Re: The bank
fraud blame game
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/aadsm27.htm#40 a fraud is a sale, Re: The bank
fraud blame game
recent item with the other side of the issue (as opposed to being able
to profit when merchants have fraud)
On Mon, 9 Jul 2007 17:52:38 +1000
"Ian Farquhar \(ifarquha\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> And don't forget, some of the biggest markets are still
> crypto-phobic. Every time I enter China I have to tick a box on the
> entry form indicating that I am not carrying any "communications
> securit
> 2. E2E crypto on mobiles would require cross-vendor support, which would mean
> that it
> would have to go into the standard. Unfortunately, standards in the mobile
> world are
> heavily influenced by governmnets, and the four horsemen of the apocalypse
> (drug
> dealers, paedophiles, spies,
