On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 7:10 AM, Peter Gutmann wrote:
> ...does anyone know of any significant use [of split keys] by
> J.Random luser? I'm interested in this from a usability point
> of view.
>
Maybe not J.Random but J.Corporate...
A few jobs ago back in the late '90s, I worked for Network Assoc
Thor Lancelot Simon writes:
>If you want to see a PKI tragedy in the making, have a look at the CRLs used
>by the US DoD.
Only "in the making"?
Actually it's all relative, in Japan the Docomo folks turned off CRLs because
they found that even a relatively modest CRL (not just the DoD monsters)
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 10:46:44PM -0700, Jon Callas wrote:
>
> I think you'll have to agree that unlike history, which starts out as
> tragedy and replays itself as farce, PKI has always been farce over the
> centuries. It might actually end up as tragedy, but so far so good. I'm
> sure that if w
I think the list may get a kick out of this.
The tech-report was actually posted on the list previously, which is
where I found it. Link included for completeness.
http://mice.cs.columbia.edu/getTechreport.php?techreportID=1433
Original Message
Subject: Re: new tech report on
|
| Unlike the work earlier this year, these attacks are more of a
| nuisance than any real danger; the tire sensors only send a message
| every 60-90 seconds, giving attackers little opportunity to compromise
| systems or cause any real damage. Nonetheless, both pieces of research
