Re: Fwd: Protection mail at rest

2008-06-03 Thread Adam Aviv
[Moderator's note: Please don't top post. --Perry] Depending on the level of protection you want, you could just add a script to your .forward to encrypt your email before delivery using PGP/GPG. However, this will leave the headers in the clear, so you will likely want to create an entirely new e

Re: Fwd: Protection mail at rest

2008-06-03 Thread Nate Lawson
Greg Black wrote: On 2008-06-02, Adam Aviv wrote: I recently implemented SSARES directly in python and also added parallelism to the searching. We can now search the a large inbox (1000+) messages in about 2-4 minutes. Not to rain on your parade, but 1,000 messages is *not* a large inbox and

Re: Fwd: Protection mail at rest

2008-06-03 Thread Adam Aviv
I agree with you, that this is not nearly fast enough. However, this is 10 times faster then our original results, where we were searching 100 emails in about the same amount of time. With production code, some more optimization, esp. client side optimizations (i.e. message caching when possible),

Re: Fwd: Protection mail at rest

2008-06-03 Thread Greg Black
On 2008-06-02, Adam Aviv wrote: > I recently implemented SSARES directly in python and also added > parallelism to the searching. We can now search the a large inbox > (1000+) messages in about 2-4 minutes. Not to rain on your parade, but 1,000 messages is *not* a large inbox and 2 to 4 minutes i

Fwd: Protection mail at rest

2008-06-02 Thread Adam Aviv
I recently implemented SSARES directly in python and also added parallelism to the searching. We can now search the a large inbox (1000+) messages in about 2-4 minutes. Technically, this could be done on a large scale and be practical, since my implementation is not fully optimized nor free of bugs