On May 27, 2004, at 12:35 PM, John Kelsey wrote:
Does anyone know whether the low-power nature of wireless LANs
protects them from eavesdropping by satellite? Is there some simple
reference that would easily let me figure out whether transmitters at
a given power are in danger of eavesdropping
Why worry about satellites when car/plane/neighbor unpiloted remote
controlled airplanes work so well?
You're free-radiating electronic emissions. That's all a determined
adversary needs. Or an opportunistic war-driving script-kiddie, for
that matter.
John Kelsey [EMAIL PROTECTED] 5/27/2004
R. A. Hettinga
At 12:35 PM -0400 5/27/04, John Kelsey wrote:
Does anyone know whether the low-power nature of wireless
LANs protects
them from eavesdropping by satellite?
It seems to me that you'd need a pretty big dish in orbit to
get that kind
of resolution.
The Keyholes(?) are
At 9:19 PM -0400 5/27/04, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
R. A. Hettinga [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At 12:35 PM -0400 5/27/04, John Kelsey wrote:
Does anyone know whether the low-power nature of wireless LANs protects
them from eavesdropping by satellite?
It seems to me that you'd need a pretty big dish
On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 01:19:15PM -0500, Matt Crawford wrote:
Don't dismiss possibilities for wireless data eavesdropping without
considering the possibilities of this new chip
http://pr.caltech.edu/media/Press_Releases/PR12490.html
and its friends
http://www.chic.caltech.edu/
If you
