Bruce Schneier wrote: (in Cryptogram)
> SHA-1 has been broken. Not a reduced-round version. Not a simplified version.
> The real thing.
>
> "One-way hash functions are supposed to have two properties. One, they're one
> way. This means that it is easy to take a message and compute the hash val
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ralf Senderek w
rites:
>
>And that is why I ask to give the Shamir Discrete Logarithm Hash Funktion a se
>cond
>thought. At leeast we have a proof of collision resistance under the assumptio
>n
>that factoring is infeasible for the modulus used.
>
>And that it more