On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 11:31:16AM -0500, Tim Dierks wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 15:59:04 -0500, Victor Duchovni
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If the symmetric cypher is fully re-keyed when sessions are resumed
> > while avoiding the fresh start PKI overhead, then life is simple
> > and sessio
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 15:59:04 -0500, Victor Duchovni
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If the symmetric cypher is fully re-keyed when sessions are resumed
> while avoiding the fresh start PKI overhead, then life is simple
> and sessions can be re-used unmodified. Otherwise I may need to
> ponder on desig
Victor Duchovni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If multiple processes (or threads) have access to a shared TLS session
> cache, does the cache need N sessions to serve N threads? Or can (I
> think unlikely if sessions resume stream-ciphers from internal state
> in the cache) the same session be used
If multiple processes (or threads) have access to a shared TLS session
cache, does the cache need N sessions to serve N threads? Or can (I
think unlikely if sessions resume stream-ciphers from internal state
in the cache) the same session be used by multiple clients?
Postfix only has one TLS sess
