On 2013-10-08, at 3:46 PM, Krisztián Pintér wrote:
> any chance to have a looksie on what happened in vegas [at PasswordsCon]?
> slides or talks online?
Szervusz Krisztián!
All of the presentations have been posted to YouTube. Here is the YouTube
Playlist
http://www.youtube.com/playlist?li
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Guido Witmond wrote:
> On 09/30/13 17:43, Adam Back wrote:
> > Anyway and all that because we are seemingly alergic to using client side
> > keys which kill the password problem dead.
>
>
> Hi Adam,
>
> I wondered about that 'allergy' myself. I have some ideas abo
Guido Witmond wrote:
On 09/30/13 19:31, Thierry Moreau wrote:
Perspective: I'm still working towards a working prototype based on
(A) the client PPKP usage paradigm (Public-Private Key Pair)
(B) the first party certification paradigm (get rid of requesting any
client PKI certificate from any CA
hi,
any chance to have a looksie on what happened in vegas? slides or talks online?
> this is to advertize an event associated to the Password Hashing
> Competition (PHC, https://password-hashing.net/): Passwords13
> Bergen, the latest conference in the Passwords^ series,
> http://passwordsc
> I would appreciate expansion on all these horror scenarios.
>
> Most of the desirable characteristics of curve25519 are things that make it
> different from NIST curves, for example montgomery coordinates protect you
> against point compression patents, since you don't calculate y, therefore
>
