This is why I always advocate for focusing more on layering security.
The cryptographic community has spent so much time fiddling around with
that one source of randomness. It's better to have another layer of
security. For instance:
https://www.github.com/kjsisco/securerg
On 6/10/2016 7:50 PM, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
Ouch... just came across this...
https://community.oracle.com/thread/2565486?start=0&tstart=0
I did not think it was possible to foul the hardware generated random
numbers (sans an occasional underflow).
Jeff
_______________________________________________
cryptography mailing list
cryptography@randombit.net
http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
_______________________________________________
cryptography mailing list
cryptography@randombit.net
http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
