On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Rose, Greg wrote:
> On 2011 Nov 30, at 16:44 , Adam Back wrote:
>
> > Are there really any CAs which issue sub-CA for "deep packet inspection"
> aka
> > doing MitM and issue certs on the fly for everything going through them:
> > gmail, hotmail, online banking etc
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 8:41 AM, Sampo Syreeni wrote:
> On 2011-07-21, Marsh Ray wrote:
>
> I guess I don't see the need to do bitcoin crypto transactions at that
>> speed any more than the other high-speed exchanges need to rapidly move
>> stock certificates, hard cash, or perform ACH/EFTs.
>>
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 9:40 PM, Peter Gutmann wrote:
> Marsh Ray writes:
>
> >I 'aint no self-appointed moderator of this list and I do find the subject
> of
> >economics terribly interesting, but maybe it would make sense to willfully
> >confine the scope of our discussion of Bitcoin and other
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 8:29 AM, Nico Williams wrote:
>
> I particularly agree that CRA and Frannie primarily set in motion the
> market dynamic that led to either the bubble itself or its ultimate
> size, or both. There's straightforward evidence: total up the amount
> in securities sold by Fran
Ian G wrote:
> The way to do this is a /contract/ which is a defined format of promise to
> deliver, date, consideration, etc. You write that down in boring ascii:
To your point, each issued BitCoin is a contract -- well, the completion of
one, anyway. The contract states as follows:
"I have p
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 7:05 PM, James A. Donald wrote:
> On 28/05/11 03:37, James A. Donald wrote:
>
>> What can be said is that the class of problems soluble by a quantum
>>> computer
>>> is larger than the class of problems soluble by a classical computer.
>>>
>>
> On 2011-05-29 9:01 AM, David
