burned, and this
has happened before. But the beauty of it is that there are so many CAs
for attackers to choose from! CT would allow the game to continue
while maybe changing the details a little.
Nicolai
___
cryptography mailing list
cryptography@randombit.net
http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 05:18:33PM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Sep 2014, Nicolai wrote:
>
> >On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 10:31:00PM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> >
> >>But we have other decentralised methods that have better privacy (such
> >>as dnssec
&
sia
support DNSSEC.
Nicolai
___
cryptography mailing list
cryptography@randombit.net
http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
wo under its belt I'd like
to try DNSChain, but for now I'm unwilling to touch major TLS libraries.
DNSChain and MinimaLT seem like they could be a great match...
Nicolai
___
cryptography mailing list
cryptography@randombit.net
http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
?
Nicolai
___
cryptography mailing list
cryptography@randombit.net
http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
probably
uses Windows, right?
NB: I'm not making any claim for or against TrueCrypt.
Nicolai
___
cryptography mailing list
cryptography@randombit.net
http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
he site which primitives are used client-side. All I see is that
combinations of sftp and ssl are used for data-in-flight.
Nicolai
___
cryptography mailing list
cryptography@randombit.net
http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
have not gotten any
> output).
You won't get feedback for a while. After beginning the do script, you
can tail -f nacl-20110221/build/$host/log to see progress.
Nicolai
___
cryptography mailing list
cryptography@randombit.net
http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
ontradicts my first answer.
DNS imposes a limit of 512 bytes (not bits) on UDP packets. Larger
packets are truncated and marked with the TC bit. This signals the
resolver to retry using TCP.
512 bytes is more than enough for a TXT record con