John Young writes:
> Cryptome's searing critique of Snowden Inc.
>
> http://timshorrock.com/?p=2354
"
and why Snowden and The Intercept continue to proselytize for Tor, the
anonymization tool, despite its massive funding from the
U.S. government, the Pentagon and the national security state.
"
(Note: Removed some mailing lists that I am not subscribed to.)
On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 5:38 AM, John Young wrote:
>
> Cryptome's searing critique of Snowden Inc.
>
> http://timshorrock.com/?p=2354
One thing that I'm not quite getting here that perhaps you can
explain. Ms. Natsios made this comm
On 2/14/16, Malcolm Matalka wrote:
>...
> Can you go into some detail on this? I was always under the impression
> that the Tor code was open source and heavily audited. Is the critique
> that this is not true or something else?
clarification in order.
1) government funding of Tor means they
On 2/14/16, Henry Baker wrote:
> Can someone please post a link to the .mp3 or .mp4 of this interview?
youtube-dl https://api.soundcloud.com/tracks/246093198
Interview with Cryptome (2016-02-06)-246093198.mp3
sha1: 2cf21291e0190dcc2b6c1fa2587994546311ea0f
_
