Can't trust anything, except the mail.
Only solution: personally encrypt messages by hand, using computers and GPG
only for transmitting master keys if the keys cannot be delivered in person.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PGP_word_list
Oddly there isn't as much outcry over this as compared to FB
>From someone failing to send to list:
> Or he actually got those docs ...
Possible, but you would expect crypto research to be
well compartmented from legal, sigint and offensive ops
that appear to be the sole scope of the known docs.
If research does posess a break, maintaining that secret
while
Here's an interesting comparison. Most academic cryptographers believe
that the NSA has lost its lead: While for years they were the only ones
doing cryptography, and were decades ahead of anyone on the outside, but
now we have so many good people on the outside that we've cau
On 17/02/2015 15:56 pm, Jerry Leichter wrote:
On Feb 17, 2015, at 6:35 AM, ianG wrote:
Here's an interesting comparison. Most academic cryptographers believe
that the NSA has lost its lead: While for years they were the only ones
doing cryptography, and were decades ahead of anyone on the out
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 4:58 PM, Jerry Leichter wrote:
> On Feb 16, 2015, at 3:39 PM, John Young wrote:
> Kaspersky Q and A for Equation Group multiple malware program, in use early
>
> as 1996. NSA implicated.
>
> https://securelist.com/files/2015/02/Equation_group_questions_and_answers.pdf
>
>
On 17/02/2015 00:58 am, Jerry Leichter wrote:
On Feb 16, 2015, at 3:39 PM, John Young mailto:j...@pipeline.com>> wrote:
Kaspersky Q and A for Equation Group multiple malware program, in use early
as 1996. NSA implicated.
https://securelist.com/files/2015/02/Equation_group_questions_and_answers.
