I've encrypted it for you now.
-BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 6:20 PM, ilsa bartlett wrote:
> Thank You all...
> is this encrypted? grin, ilsa
-END PGP MESSAGE-
___
cryptography mailing list
cryptography@randombit.net
htt
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 8:18 PM, Sean Beck wrote:
> Does it look encrypted?
>
Encrypted with a virus
--
Tony Arcieri
___
cryptography mailing list
cryptography@randombit.net
http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
- Original Message -
From: "John Young"
To: "Riad S. Wahby" , "grarpamp" ,
cypherpu...@cpunks.org, cryptography@randombit.net
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2013 4:42:48 AM
Subject: Re: [cryptography] Cypherpunks
>Opposition, disgust, revulsion, ridic
Opposition, disgust, revulsion, ridicule toward al-qaeda
is perfectly cypherpunkian. Never, ever unanimous nor
what's acceptable without merciless, obnoxious, off-topic
digression argument. "Fuck that to death." - A Sage
"Cypherpunks" -- the name, the adventure, the rise and
fall, and multiple re
I made cypherpu...@librelist.com. Nice and non-controversial. Feel free to
post there.
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Ted Smith wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-03-25 at 21:28 +0100, Eugen Leitl wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 07:03:04PM +0100, Adam Back wrote:
> >
> > > But my point actually was b..
On Mon, 2013-03-25 at 21:28 +0100, Eugen Leitl wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 07:03:04PM +0100, Adam Back wrote:
>
> > But my point actually was b...@al-qaeda.net??? Come on that is watch list
>
> Of course it is pure watch list bait. That's the point.
>
> > bait and an invitation NOT to join
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 07:03:04PM +0100, Adam Back wrote:
> But my point actually was b...@al-qaeda.net??? Come on that is watch list
Of course it is pure watch list bait. That's the point.
> bait and an invitation NOT to join list blah, whatever it is about.
If you think it's a deterrent, th
* Adam Back schrieb am 2013-03-25 um 09:25 Uhr:
> Maybe someone with a more neutral domain could try it - or a
> cypherpunks.* domain if they have a listserv handy.
Our local hackerspace uses a rather neutral address:
https://list.lstsrv.org/>
We could also host the Cypherpunks list, if you like.
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 1:25 AM, Adam Back wrote:
> Yeah but that is basically zero traffic, and I suspect in large part because
> its a silly domain that people who dislike inviting their addition to a
> watch-list will avoid.
i like it. waiting for the day they accept donations and i can provid
Speaking as one of the two people who started that particular effort, it never
quite worked out that way.
Way too many TLAs, law suits, IRS visits, and those who read their own press
releases to make it nearly as enjoyable as it sounds.
Moritz wrote:
> On 25.03.2013 09:25, Adam Back wrot
Well then start one up and show us how it's done Adam. Put your money where
your mouth is.
Adam Back wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 05:13:57PM +0100, Moritz wrote:
> >On 25.03.2013 09:25, Adam Back wrote:
> >> because its a silly domain that people who dislike inviting their
> >> additi
Cyberpunk, cypherpunk, coderpunks... is all fine, I think people have
understood the etymology of those terms after a few decades, negative
connotations to some of 'punk' notwithstanding, a cypherpunk is a term for
an area of interest or philosophy with a dictionary definition at this
point.
But
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 05:50:18PM +0100, Adam Back wrote:
>> Isn't exactly that a nice property of a "cypherpunks" list?
>
> No it is not, it is a way to persuade people to leave, or not join the
> listserv.
We have to agree to disagree on that one. A 'punk' of any
kind will tend to thumb his no
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 05:13:57PM +0100, Moritz wrote:
On 25.03.2013 09:25, Adam Back wrote:
because its a silly domain that people who dislike inviting their
addition to a watch-list will avoid.
Isn't exactly that a nice property of a "cypherpunks" list?
No it is not, it is a way to persua
On 25.03.2013 09:25, Adam Back wrote:
> because
> its a silly domain that people who dislike inviting their addition to a
> watch-list will avoid.
Isn't exactly that a nice property of a "cypherpunks" list?
> Maybe someone with a more neutral domain could try it - or a cypherpunks.*
> domain if t
Yeah but that is basically zero traffic, and I suspect in large part because
its a silly domain that people who dislike inviting their addition to a
watch-list will avoid.
Maybe someone with a more neutral domain could try it - or a cypherpunks.*
domain if they have a listserv handy.
Adam
On Mo
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 12:46:49AM -0700, Tony Arcieri wrote:
> The original Cypherpunks mailing list seems dead.
>
> Is there any list that it's successor?
De facto it's cypherpu...@al-qaeda.net
___
cryptography mailing list
cryptography@randombit.net
The original Cypherpunks mailing list seems dead.
Is there any list that it's successor?
--
Tony Arcieri
___
cryptography mailing list
cryptography@randombit.net
http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
18 matches
Mail list logo
