ppear quickly at this stage -- is
a) unlikely to be adopted by criminals -- how many actually expect fanatic
terrorist to _upgrade_ to a version _publicly_ acknowledged to contain
CIA/FBI/NSA/WHOEVER backdoors?
b) not likely to avoid attacks by people trying to crack the scheme; and
once
e optimizing compilers have generally exceeded human ability in
> low-level optimizing - not that that won't stop me from trying, now and
> then.
>
> BTW, the code used for the DES crackers bears about as much
> resemblence to
