(Forwarded from EROS Operating System Architects list)
Original Message
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 11:10:13 -0400
From: "David Chizmadia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "EROS Architects"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I thought that readers of these lists migh
(This essay hits many very effective points. One of the key
things that needs to be borne in mind, however, is the fact
that technological proposals currently on the table are
implementations of the notion, foreign to American society
and jurisprudence, of creators' "moral rights" -- a term
basi
udicrous notion that
constraining our right to use the information we receive,
meets even the most basic of principles of a free society.
Seth Johnson
"John S. Denker" wrote:
>
> bear wrote:
> >
> > ... I have one box with all the protection I want:
> > it&#x
(Forwarded from CYBERIA list)
Original Message
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 18:02:06 -0400
From: "R. A. Hettinga" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- begin forwarded text
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 22:18:29 +0100
From: Somebody
To: "R. A. Hettinga" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subjec
(Forwarded from DMCA Activists list. Article text pasted
below. -- Seth)
Original Message
Date: 15 Aug 2002 12:30:02 -0400
From: Matthew Caron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: DMCA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> http://www.guardian.co.uk/Archive/Article/0,4273,4477138,00.html
In short:
1.)
(Forwarded from Digital Bearer Settlement List)
Original Message
Subject: MS recruits for Palladium microkernel and/or DRM
platform
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 08:13:48 -0400
From: "R. A. Hettinga" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Digital Bearer Settlement List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://ww
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/26231.html
MS white paper says Palladium open, clean, not DRM
By John Lettice
Posted: 17/07/2002 at 09:25 GMT
A final draft of Microsoft's Palladium consultation white
paper appears to have escaped, and is currently being hosted
by Neowin.net. Microsoft
TCPA and Palladium are content control for the masses. They
are an attempt to encourage the public to confuse the public
interest issues of content control with the private interest
issues of privacy and security.
Seth Johnson
--
[CC] Counter-copyright:
http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/cc
