Re: double shot of snake oil, good conclusion

2003-03-07 Thread Tal Garfinkel
On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 09:38:25AM -0800, Ed Gerck wrote: > > > Tal Garfinkel wrote: > > > The value of these type of controls that they help users you basically > > trust who might be careless, stupid, lazy or confused to do the right > > thing (however the right

Re: double shot of snake oil, good conclusion

2003-03-05 Thread Tal Garfinkel
> DRM can't really control what humans do and there is no commercial > value in saying that a document that I see cannot be printed or > forwarded -- because it can. I believe you are overlooking the assumed threat model, and thus the value of document control systems like the one that Microsoft i

Re: Palladium -- trivially weak in hw but "secure in software"?? (Re: palladium presentation - anyone going?)

2002-10-22 Thread Tal Garfinkel
> Software-based attacks are redistributable. Once I write a program > that hacks a computer, I can give that program to anyone to use. I > can even give it to everyone, and then anyone could use it. The > expertise necessary can be abstracted away into a program even my > mother could use. > >