Re: MS DRMOS Palladium -- The Trojan Horse OS

2002-07-04 Thread Mark S. Miller
At 09:42 AM 7/3/2002 Wednesday, Marc Branchaud wrote: >By patenting the DRMOS, only M$ will be allowed to create such a beast (OK, >they could license the patent without restrictions -- pardon me while I pick >myself up off the floor). This means that the rest of the planet's OSes >will have n

wrong data model -- Re: MS DRMOS Palladium -- The Trojan Horse OS

2002-07-04 Thread Ed Gerck
Marc: There is no reason IMO to talk about economics when basic properties are being ignored. DRMOS will fail for pretty much the same basic reason that PKI is failing. We are still trying to create an absolute reference to measure "distance" in dataspace, when such reference cannot exist by def

Re: MS DRMOS Palladium -- The Trojan Horse OS

2002-07-03 Thread Marc Branchaud
By patenting the DRMOS, only M$ will be allowed to create such a beast (OK, they could license the patent without restrictions -- pardon me while I pick myself up off the floor). This means that the rest of the planet's OSes will have nothing even approaching DRM functionality, because nobod

MS DRMOS Palladium -- The Trojan Horse OS

2002-07-02 Thread Jon O.
- Forwarded message - Reviewing the Microsoft DRM OS (Palladium Patent) it became apparent Richard Stallman's short story, The Right to Read is indeed visionary. Stallman wrote the story back in 1997, about a dystopian society which borders on Orwell's 1984. The "Right to Read" can be fo