Re: Wiretap Act Does Not Cover Message 'in Storage' For Short Period(was Re: BNA's Internet Law News (ILN) - 2/27/03)

2003-03-06 Thread Will Rodger
John says: Wireless is a horse of a different color. IANAL but the last time I looked, there was no federal law against intercepting most wireless signals, but you were (generally) not allowed to disclose the contents to anyone else. No longer, if it ever was. It's a crime, as evidenced by the

Re: Wiretap Act Does Not Cover Message 'in Storage' For Short Period(was Re: BNA's Internet Law News (ILN) - 2/27/03)

2003-03-06 Thread John S. Denker
Will Rodger wrote: John says: Wireless is a horse of a different color. IANAL but the last time I looked, there was no federal law against intercepting most wireless signals, but you were (generally) not allowed to disclose the contents to anyone else. No longer, if it ever was. It's a

Re: Wiretap Act Does Not Cover Message 'in Storage' For Short Period

2003-03-06 Thread Arnold G. Reinhold
At 4:57 PM -0500 3/5/03, John S. Denker wrote: Tim Dierks wrote: In order to avoid overreaction to a nth-hand story, I've attempted to locate some primary sources. Konop v. Hawaiian Airlines: http://laws.lp.findlaw.com/getcase/9th/case/9955106pexact=1 [US v Councilman:]

Re: Wiretap Act Does Not Cover Message 'in Storage' For Short Period (was Re: BNA's Internet Law News (ILN) - 2/27/03)

2003-03-06 Thread Will Rodger
John says: Next time, before disagreeing with someone: a) Please read what he actually wrote, and b) Don't quote snippets out of context. Three sentences later, at the end of the paragraph that began as quoted above, I explicitly pointed out that cellphone transmissions are a more-protected

Re: Wiretap Act Does Not Cover Message 'in Storage' For Short Period

2003-03-05 Thread John S. Denker
Tim Dierks wrote: In order to avoid overreaction to a nth-hand story, I've attempted to locate some primary sources. Konop v. Hawaiian Airlines: http://laws.lp.findlaw.com/getcase/9th/case/9955106pexact=1 [US v Councilman:]

Re: Wiretap Act Does Not Cover Message 'in Storage' For Short Period (was Re: BNA's Internet Law News (ILN) - 2/27/03)

2003-03-05 Thread Tim Dierks
At 02:30 PM 3/5/2003 -0500, Steven M. Bellovin wrote: From: Somebody Technically, since their signal speed is slower than light, even transmission lines act as storage devices. Wire tapping is now legal. The crucial difference, from a law enforcement perspective, is how hard it is to get the

Re: Wiretap Act Does Not Cover Message 'in Storage' For Short Period (was Re: BNA's Internet Law News (ILN) - 2/27/03)

2003-03-02 Thread Tim Dierks
At 01:39 PM 2/27/2003 -0500, R. A. Hettinga wrote: At 9:01 AM -0500 on 2/27/03, BNA Highlights wrote: WIRETAP ACT DOES NOT COVER MESSAGE 'IN STORAGE' FOR SHORT PERIOD BNA's Electronic Commerce Law Report reports that a federal court in Massachusetts has ruled that the federal Wiretap Act

Re: Wiretap Act Does Not Cover Message 'in Storage' For Short Period

2003-03-02 Thread MindFuq
* Tim Dierks [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-03-02 12:27]: This would seem to imply to me that the wiretap act does not apply to any normal telephone conversation which is carried at any point in its transit by an electronic switch, including all cell phone calls and nearly all wireline calls,