Re: [Cryptography-dev] "intrinsic" symmetric key identifier?

Hi, Apologies in advance for late and possibly duplicated message. Originally sent from my iPhone, from wrong e-mail address, which made the mailing list manager unhappy. > On Jul 6, 2016, at 13:22, Frank Siebenlist > wrote: >> For some more context on “it de

Re: [Cryptography-dev] "intrinsic" symmetric key identifier?

On Wed, 2016-07-06 at 17:20 -0500, Laurens Van Houtven wrote: > > Right. The reason I'm being so persistent is similar to why a lot of > cryptographers dislike PAKE -- it's not that it's bad or hard to do -- > it just seems like a weird problem to have. To quote Glyph, it sounded > a bit like a ja

Re: [Cryptography-dev] "intrinsic" symmetric key identifier?

> On Jul 7, 2016, at 7:22 AM, Simo Sorce wrote: > On Wed, 2016-07-06 at 17:20 -0500, Laurens Van Houtven wrote: >> >> Right. The reason I'm being so persistent is similar to why a lot of >> cryptographers dislike PAKE -- it's not that it's bad or hard to do -- >> it just seems like a weird probl

Re: [Cryptography-dev] "intrinsic" symmetric key identifier?

On Thu, 2016-07-07 at 07:36 -0500, lvh wrote: > > On Jul 7, 2016, at 7:22 AM, Simo Sorce wrote: > > On Wed, 2016-07-06 at 17:20 -0500, Laurens Van Houtven wrote: > >> > >> Right. The reason I'm being so persistent is similar to why a lot of > >> cryptographers dislike PAKE -- it's not that it's b