Cryptography-Digest Digest #983

2000-06-09 Thread Digestifier
Cryptography-Digest Digest #983, Volume #11 Fri, 9 Jun 00 06:13:00 EDT Contents: Re: Some dumb questions (William Rowden) Re: Some dumb questions (Jim Gillogly) Re: Question about recommended keysizes (768 bit RSA) (Jerry Coffin) Re: XTR independent benchmarks (Roger Schlafly)

Cryptography-Digest Digest #985

2000-06-09 Thread Digestifier
Cryptography-Digest Digest #985, Volume #11 Fri, 9 Jun 00 10:13:01 EDT Contents: Re: Multiple encryptions (Guy Macon) Re: Observer 4/6/2000: "Your privacy ends here" (Paul Shirley) help for rc5 cryptanalysis ("Stanley") Re: My lastest paper on Block Ciphers (Simon Johnson) Re:

Cryptography-Digest Digest #986

2000-06-09 Thread Digestifier
Cryptography-Digest Digest #986, Volume #11 Fri, 9 Jun 00 11:13:01 EDT Contents: Re: Observer 4/6/2000: "Your privacy ends here" (George Edwards) Re: Observer 4/6/2000: "Your privacy ends here" (George Edwards) How did Mr. Schneier calcuate this figure? ("Jeff Moser") Re: Random IV

Cryptography-Digest Digest #988

2000-06-09 Thread Digestifier
Cryptography-Digest Digest #988, Volume #11 Fri, 9 Jun 00 12:13:01 EDT Contents: Re: Statistics of occurences of prime number sequences in PRBG output as (John) Re: Thanks Sci.Crypt Readers (tomstd) Re: Statistics of occurences of prime number sequences in PRBG output as (John) Re:

Cryptography-Digest Digest #990

2000-06-09 Thread Digestifier
Cryptography-Digest Digest #990, Volume #11 Fri, 9 Jun 00 16:13:01 EDT Contents: Re: PK analogue for passwords ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Re: My lastest paper on Block Ciphers (Runu Knips) Re: How did Mr. Schneier calcuate this figure? (John Myre) Re: Extending the size of polyalphabetic

Cryptography-Digest Digest #991

2000-06-09 Thread Digestifier
Cryptography-Digest Digest #991, Volume #11 Fri, 9 Jun 00 18:13:01 EDT Contents: Re: Cryptographic voting (Virgil) Re: XTR independent benchmarks (d g) Re: Random IV Generation (Terry Ritter) Re: Updated: Evidence Eliminator Dis-Information Center (Includes info on false SPAM