Hi all. I have completed the redesign of www.web-buddha.co.uk. ... The
site seems stable in all browsers on a variety of platforms apart from
IE5.2/Mac.
Your site killed IE Mac 5.2 here too, although it was pretty much dead to
begin with really;)
Your page does not validate, I would start
I'm not a professional web site designer, but have built them just for my
small company over the past eight years. The latest revision is done, but
there's one niggling display issue I would like to resolve if I can.
I have a banner/header on the top of each page, with an image as
On Jun 11, 2006, at 10:04 AM, Stephen Karsch wrote:
hey everyone!
i'm trying to figure out why the following site looks fine in FF
and IE6
but not safari...
http://www.phillywriter.com/
any help is greatly appreciated.
I'm not stumped.
And I believe Safari is not completely incorrect.
On 6/10/06, Rich Shepard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a banner/header on the top of each page, with an image as
background. On this are positioned (sorta') two .png images: our
logo on the left, and our brand on the right.
properly. However, on IE
If you are using transparency on the
On Sat, 10 Jun 2006, Ed Seehouse wrote:
If you are using transparency on the .png's, IE cannot handle that.
Ed,
No, I don't need transparency. Unless I need the details (such as with a
digital photo image), I tend to keep all bit-mapped graphics as .png.
Congrants though, on valid xhtml
Rich Shepard wrote:
Is there something I can do to have IE see the pages as I prepared them?
http://www.appl-ecosys.com/.
I would go for the /slightly/ degraded look of 8 bit pngs here.
Somewhat like these...
http://www.gunlaug.no/tos/alien/aesi-logo.2006.png
Andy Mosmiller wrote:
I just completed some updates on the following website, and am
encountering a major and for my part unexplainable IE bug.
http://www.kipke.com/supporters.html
Firstly, what is this bug, and secondly, how do I fix it?
The italic bug :-)
Have a look at...
On Sun, 11 Jun 2006, Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
I would go for the /slightly/ degraded look of 8 bit pngs here. Somewhat
like these... http://www.gunlaug.no/tos/alien/aesi-logo.2006.png
http://www.gunlaug.no/tos/alien/brand.png
...that will work just fine in IE/win.
Georg,
So, it's more a
Rich Shepard wrote:
So, it's more a function of the color depth than being PNG rather
than JPEG format? That's interesting.
I just replaced the .png files with .jpg ones and asked a friend to
see if it looks better that way.
Many thanks for your lesson!
You've learned the wrong lesson,
I never would have guessed it was italics at fault.
I need a better handle on IE bugs. Is there a resource or book that
lists known bugs so I can stop bugging you guys about them?
This bug fix was a life-saver,
Andy
__
i've been looking at the different tableless form solutions out there
(floats, fieldsets, etc.), but the whole thing strikes as a bit of
overkill. some folks argue that forms are tabular data, and that they
should be laid out using, well, tables.
what do you guys think? tables or CSS? and
Andy Mosmiller wrote:
Is there a resource or book that
lists known bugs so I can stop bugging you guys about them?
Andy
I think of IE as being hopeless :-) . But these sites are helpful,
nevertheless:
1] http://www.satzansatz.de/cssd/onhavinglayout.html
2] http://www.positioniseverything.net/
12 matches
Mail list logo