Any idea why this page does not look right (the footer is showing up before
the actual content) in FireFox and Opera? It looks ok on IE 7.
Any help is appreciated.
Thanks
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.o
david wrote:
> !important is not a hack. It's an official W3C thing,
That doesn't mean is can't still be called a hack... '-p
--
-Mike Schinkel
http://www.mikeschinkel.com/blogs/
http://www.welldesignedurls.org
http://atlanta-web.org
!important is not a hack. It's an official W3C thing, although I believe
it's supposed to be used only in user stylesheets.
Slob Jones wrote:
> Let me post the question properly.
>
> The hack !important works in IE6 but not in IE7.
>
> Is there a hack -- or perhaps another routine -- that will
I have been lurking here for the last month and have a question about
the right way to handle IE using CSS.
I use a master CSS file with the format as follows. To me, the master
file method as well as solving the 'old browser' issue, is easier for
another designer to approach my code.
/* Master C
Slob Jones wrote:
> Let me post the question properly.
>
> The hack !important works in IE6 but not in IE7.
>
> Is there a hack -- or perhaps another routine -- that will work in IE7?
>
> My particular problem regards positioning. I find that extra pixel or
> two in IE can make a design look less
Create stylesheets with the css you want to feed IE6 and IE7. Then put
conditional comments in the head of your page:
Hi David,
I went back in and cleaned up the CSS, XHTML, and PHP, so that the page
passed both the XHTML and CSS validators at W3C. That did not fix the IE7
issue, but it ensured me that I was working on a clean slate.
The problem was IE7, and not so much IE6. Firefox (and other Mozilla)
browser
Let me post the question properly.
The hack !important works in IE6 but not in IE7.
Is there a hack -- or perhaps another routine -- that will work in IE7?
My particular problem regards positioning. I find that extra pixel or
two in IE can make a design look less than stellar.
david wrote:
>
On Jan 6, 2008, at 12:35 AM, Bruno Fassino wrote:
>> With a long caption, the text does not wrap to the width of the
>> image, but that is expected.
>
> Yes. To always get a "fit" to the width of the image (or to a wider
> unbreakable word, if any) there is:
>
> width: -moz-min-content;
Good poi