Re: [css-d] Condensing BORDER-xxx-STYLE

On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 09:14 +0900, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: > On Apr 13, 2009, at 7:01 AM, Brian Hazelton wrote: > > >> Really interesting link thanks. Last question on the subject, is it > >> impossible to condense this code? (As the borders are different I > >> imagine it is) Thanks: >

Re: [css-d] Condensing BORDER-xxx-STYLE

On Apr 13, 2009, at 7:01 AM, Brian Hazelton wrote: >> Really interesting link thanks. Last question on the subject, is it >> impossible to condense this code? (As the borders are different I >> imagine it is) Thanks: >> >> BORDER-RIGHT: #333 0px solid; >> BORDER-TOP: #333 0px solid; >> BORDER

Re: [css-d] Condensing BORDER-xxx-STYLE

From: trevor bayliss is it impossible to condense this code? (As the borders are different I imagine it is) Thanks: > >BORDER-RIGHT: #333 0px solid; >BORDER-TOP: #333 0px solid; >BORDER-LEFT: #333 0px solid; >BORDER-BOTTOM: #fff 5px solid; If you are overriding previous borders, one way wou

Re: [css-d] Condensing BORDER-xxx-STYLE

On Sun, 2009-04-12 at 14:53 -0700, trevor bayliss wrote: > > > > --- On Sun, 4/12/09, David Laakso wrote: > > > From: David Laakso > > Subject: Re: [css-d] Condensing BORDER-xxx-STYLE > > To: bayliss_tre...@yahoo.com > > Cc: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org > > Date: Sunday, April 12, 2009, 2:01

Re: [css-d] Condensing BORDER-xxx-STYLE

--- On Sun, 4/12/09, David Laakso wrote: > From: David Laakso > Subject: Re: [css-d] Condensing BORDER-xxx-STYLE > To: bayliss_tre...@yahoo.com > Cc: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org > Date: Sunday, April 12, 2009, 2:01 PM > trevor bayliss wrote: > > Thank you Brian, David, Marcio, Els and Val! >

Re: [css-d] Condensing BORDER-xxx-STYLE

trevor bayliss wrote: > Thank you Brian, David, Marcio, Els and Val! > I got rid of the uppercase letters in the css > > How do I do the same for > border-top-width > border-bottom-width > > would it be: > border-width: Top Right Bottom Left? > > > Please read:

Re: [css-d] Condensing BORDER-xxx-STYLE

David Laakso wrote: > trevor bayliss wrote: >> How can I condense this CSS? Is it possible? thank you >> >> BORDER-TOP-STYLE: none; >> BORDER-RIGHT-STYLE: none; >> BORDER-LEFT-STYLE: none; >> BORDER-BOTTOM-STYLE: none; Looks like CSS generated by Interner Explorer when sav

Re: [css-d] Condensing BORDER-xxx-STYLE

trevor bayliss wrote: > How do I do the same for > border-top-width > border-bottom-width You can't. > would it be: > border-width: Top Right Bottom Left? This would always set all four border widths to some value, so it would not be equivalent to the two declarations you mentioned. Is there

Re: [css-d] Condensing BORDER-xxx-STYLE

Thank you Brian, David, Marcio, Els and Val! I got rid of the uppercase letters in the css How do I do the same for border-top-width border-bottom-width would it be: border-width: Top Right Bottom Left? __ css-discuss

Re: [css-d] How to set opacity

On Sun, 2009-04-12 at 21:37 +0200, Els wrote: > Chike Loney wrote: > > > How do I set the opacity of a to let's say 50% > > opacity:0.5; > > http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-color/#opacity > > Not sure which browsers support it, and also has the disadvantage that > the text in the div will also be

Re: [css-d] How to set opacity

Chike Loney wrote: > How do I set the opacity of a to let's say 50% opacity:0.5; http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-color/#opacity Not sure which browsers support it, and also has the disadvantage that the text in the div will also become transparent. If the background of the div is a solid colour (r

Re: [css-d] proper use of cite

Brian Hazelton wrote: > If I put in the footer "site by xxx" would that be a proper use of > cite or should I just use a ? According to this reference: http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#the-cite-element it doesn't look like would be correct use for 'site by .. '. I'd use for that l

Re: [css-d] proper use of cite

thank you, that was very insightful, i will probably use a variation of that (not include so much information as i just want to put a link back to my company) On Sun, 2009-04-12 at 21:03 +0100, Christian Heilmann wrote: > Brian Hazelton wrote: > > If I put in the footer "site by xxx" would that b

Re: [css-d] proper use of cite

Brian Hazelton wrote: > If I put in the footer "site by xxx" would that be a proper use of cite > or should I just use a ? > > If there is information about who maintains the document the footer is in, address is actually the most appropriate. You can even make it more useful with a vcard:

[css-d] proper use of cite

If I put in the footer "site by xxx" would that be a proper use of cite or should I just use a ? __ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.i

Re: [css-d] How to set opacity

> > How do I set the opacity of a to let's say 50% > Maybe this will help you: http://www.w3schools.com/Css/css_image_transparency.asp ps- I've never use it. I' have just "Google it" with the string: "div opacity CSS" :s Regards, Márcio __

[css-d] How to set opacity

How do I set the opacity of a to let's say 50% Thnks Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device available from bmobile. __ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FA

Re: [css-d] Condensing BORDER-xxx-STYLE

trevor bayliss wrote: > How can I condense this CSS? Is it possible? thank you > > BORDER-TOP-STYLE: none; >BORDER-RIGHT-STYLE: none; >BORDER-LEFT-STYLE: none; >BORDER-BOTTOM-STYLE: none; border-style:none; See http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/propidx.html for a complete list o

Re: [css-d] Condensing BORDER-xxx-STYLE

> > I'm not a CSS guru like most of the collaborators, so sorry any wrong > information. > I believe like this: > > "border-style: none;" > > > Regards, > Márcio > > > -Original Message- > > From: css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org [mailto:css-d- > > boun...@lists.css-discuss.org] On

Re: [css-d] What can I do to improve this CSS?

trevor bayliss wrote: > Hi all, > This is my latest attempt at css, the xhtml validates, I feel though that > although it works fine it could be made a lot cleaner and maybe I am missing > some important concepts: > > http://tinyurl.com/clg668 > > I would be very greatful if someone could have

Re: [css-d] My footer background image is misplaced in IE 6

Michael Stevens wrote: > http://testsite1.bigmikes.org/ > http://testsite1.bigmikes.org/jbc.css > > In FF the pages render fine but in IE the footer image is not being > placed {bottom right no-repeat} as I've requested. It's cramming it > up at the top of the footer div which puts the pattern rig

Re: [css-d] Condensing BORDER-xxx-STYLE

sorry, I did not realize that you were referring to an image border (which by default is not none). My answer earlier is wrong for images. On Sun, 2009-04-12 at 14:38 -0400, David Laakso wrote: > trevor bayliss wrote: > > How can I condense this CSS? Is it possible? thank you > > > > BORDER-T

Re: [css-d] Condensing BORDER-xxx-STYLE

trevor bayliss wrote: > How can I condense this CSS? Is it possible? thank you > > BORDER-TOP-STYLE: none; > BORDER-RIGHT-STYLE: none; > BORDER-LEFT-STYLE: none; > BORDER-BOTTOM-STYLE: none; > > > > Assuming the above is in reference to this selector from the ur

Re: [css-d] Condensing BORDER-xxx-STYLE

I'm not a CSS guru like most of the collaborators, so sorry any wrong information. I believe like this: "border-style: none;" Regards, Márcio > -Original Message- > From: css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org [mailto:css-d- > boun...@lists.css-discuss.org] On Behalf Of trevor bayliss > Se

Re: [css-d] Condensing BORDER-xxx-STYLE

you can take all of it out, borders by default are none so it does not need to be there in the first place On Sun, 2009-04-12 at 11:03 -0700, trevor bayliss wrote: > How can I condense this CSS? Is it possible? thank you > > BORDER-TOP-STYLE: none; > BORDER-RIGHT-STYLE: none; >

Re: [css-d] My footer background image is misplaced in IE 6

Michael Stevens wrote: > http://testsite1.bigmikes.org/ > > In FF the pages render fine but in IE the footer image is not being placed > {bottom right no-repeat} as I've requested. It's cramming it up at the top > of the footer div which puts the pattern right in the middle instead of at > the bott

[css-d] Condensing BORDER-xxx-STYLE

How can I condense this CSS? Is it possible? thank you BORDER-TOP-STYLE: none; BORDER-RIGHT-STYLE: none; BORDER-LEFT-STYLE: none; BORDER-BOTTOM-STYLE: none; __ css-discuss [cs...@list

Re: [css-d] QuickTime/IE fail

phidlerw...@gmail.com wrote: > I carefully followed the instructions from > http://www.alistapart.com/articles/byebyeembed > (which uses the OBJECT tag without EMBED) and am using a simple > template from 456BereaSt. How do I get the bleepin' thing to work on > IE? (Works fine on Safari and

[css-d] My footer background image is misplaced in IE 6

http://testsite1.bigmikes.org/ http://testsite1.bigmikes.org/jbc.css In FF the pages render fine but in IE the footer image is not being placed {bottom right no-repeat} as I've requested. It's cramming it up at the top of the footer div which puts the patt

[css-d] QuickTime/IE fail

Pulling my hair out over this one... A new hosting client of mine creates and publishes simple pages with an embedded Quicktime video using iWeb. I thought it'd be a trivial matter to recreate a clean, simple CSS-based page to accomplish this. But, of course, IDWIMIE. I carefully followed t

Re: [css-d] What can I do to improve this CSS?

Thanks Gunlaug, Val and David really appreciated __ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://cs

Re: [css-d] What can I do to improve this CSS?

trevor bayliss wrote: > http://tinyurl.com/clg668 > > I would be very greatful if someone could have a look and advise me > what to do, Thank you, Regards, Trev Apply some shorthand and combined selectors, maybe, to reduce the amount of redundant styling. For instance... .nav { padding-right :

[css-d] What can I do to improve this CSS?

Hi all, This is my latest attempt at css, the xhtml validates, I feel though that although it works fine it could be made a lot cleaner and maybe I am missing some important concepts: http://tinyurl.com/clg668 I would be very greatful if someone could have a look and advise me what to do,