Re: [css-d] stand-down

On 2009/07/22 19:41 (GMT-0400) David Laakso composed: ... > re: ... > Then you will need to purchase a monitor for me so that I can see the > whole page on the screen in order to make a capture of it :-) . Firefox 3.0.11 fullscreen 1600x2560. No scroll

Re: [css-d] stand-down

On Wednesday 22 July 2009 06:03:57 pm David Laakso wrote: > Ron Zisman wrote: > > david, > > > > i'm glad you took my comments in the spirit intended. design is > > greatly subjective. > > so i have no idea of whether or not they have any value. > > > > rgds, > > ron > > >

Re: [css-d] stand-down

On Wednesday 22 July 2009 08:29:08 pm Felix Miata wrote: > On 2009/07/22 19:41 (GMT-0400) David Laakso composed: > > Ron Zisman wrote: > >> i want to see the whole damn page. > > > > re: > > > > Then you will need to purchase a monitor for me so that I c

Re: [css-d] What would you do to improve css?

On 23/07/2009, at 9:58 AM, David McGlone wrote: > On Wednesday 22 July 2009 02:19:50 pm Leszek Stachowski wrote: >> Hi! >> That's my first activity in here, so forgive anything wrong I could >> do :) >> >> I've got a simple question for you: what would you change in css ? >> What >> annoys yo

Re: [css-d] What would you do to improve css?

On Wednesday 22 July 2009 02:19:50 pm Leszek Stachowski wrote: > Hi! > That's my first activity in here, so forgive anything wrong I could do :) > > I've got a simple question for you: what would you change in css ? What > annoys you ? What repeatable action would you replace with another ? > > I'm

Re: [css-d] stand-down

On Wednesday 22 July 2009 01:29:04 pm Don Miller wrote: > > David Laakso wrote: > >> Dawn will arrive soon enough. > > > > And I can't wait. > > > >> In the meantime, your comments and suggestions -- thus far -- are always > >> welcome. > >> > >> Best, > >> Westmoreland > >>

Re: [css-d] What would you do to improve css?

David Robertson wrote: > I had a bit of trouble sending this to the list, so I'm sorry if there's > been any problems! =). > > > If I'm declaring two properties with the same value, such as: > > body, html { margin: 0px; > padding: 0px; > } > > It seems more intuitive to me to be able to

Re: [css-d] stand-down

On 2009/07/22 19:41 (GMT-0400) David Laakso composed: > Ron Zisman wrote: >> i want to see the whole damn page. > re: > Then you will need to purchase a monitor for me so that I can see the > whole page on the screen in order to make a capture of it

Re: [css-d] stand-down

Hi David. On Wednesday 22 July 2009 23:03:57 David Laakso wrote: > Reload and take no prisoners. I have a comment or two, mostly regarding your navigation design, which is only tangentially about CSS. I hope it is not inappropriate. On the page there are 3 main navigation elements; the menu on

Re: [css-d] text wrap

Joseph Sims wrote: > I have some images floated right with text on the left, and in > Mozilla 3.5, the text doesn't obey the margin of the image and > overlays it... upon refresh it corrects itself... what gives? > Mozilla 3.5 = ??? > And I have no idea what's goin' on in Safari 4. Forcing overfl

Re: [css-d] stand-down

Ron Zisman wrote: > > you asked for it!!! > > i want to see the whole damn page. re: Then you will need to purchase a monitor for me so that I can see the whole page on the screen in order to make a capture of it :-) . In the meantime, if you reloa

[css-d] text wrap

I have some images floated right with text on the left, and in Mozilla 3.5, the text doesn't obey the margin of the image and overlays it... upon refresh it corrects itself... what gives? And I have no idea what's goin' on in Safari 4. Forcing overflow: auto it looks like... but I don't think

Re: [css-d] stand-down

http://www.ricochet.org the ox is slow but the earth is patient On Jul 22, 2009, at 6:03 PM, David Laakso wrote: > Ron Zisman wrote: >> david, >> >> i'm glad you took my comments in the spirit intended. design is >> greatly subjective. >> so i have no idea of whether or not they have any value.

Re: [css-d] stand-down

Ron Zisman wrote: > david, > > i'm glad you took my comments in the spirit intended. design is > greatly subjective. > so i have no idea of whether or not they have any value. > > rgds, > ron > Everyone who has replied made very valuable

Re: [css-d] stand-down

david, i'm glad you took my comments in the spirit intended. design is greatly subjective. so i have no idea of whether or not they have any value. i hate critics and am uncomfortable imposing my aesthetic on others. i've been watching the process/updates and your willingness to examine th

Re: [css-d] stand-down

tedd wrote: > At 10:43 PM -0400 7/21/09, David Laakso wrote: >> >> > > > > David : > > As always, looks great. > > Functionality concern. To review some examples, I have to scroll down > to get to the pagination. If you place the pagination on the top,

Re: [css-d] What would you do to improve css?

I had a bit of trouble sending this to the list, so I'm sorry if there's been any problems! =). If I'm declaring two properties with the same value, such as: body, html { margin: 0px; padding: 0px; } It seems more intuitive to me to be able to write: body, html { margin, padding: 0px;

Re: [css-d] stand-down

Alan Gresley wrote: > >> >> > > > David, > > I fell someone confined and restricted with the line. Let some air > invade that space so the design can breath. > > > #content img { > max-width : 96%!important; > height: auto; > display : block; >

Re: [css-d] stand-down

Don Miller wrote: > > >> David Laakso wrote: >>> Dawn will arrive soon enough. >> >> And I can't wait. >> >> >>> In the meantime, your comments and suggestions -- thus far -- are >>> always >>> welcome. >>> >>> Best, >>> Westmoreland >>> >> >> > I get a

[css-d] What would you do to improve css?

Hi! That's my first activity in here, so forgive anything wrong I could do :) I've got a simple question for you: what would you change in css ? What annoys you ? What repeatable action would you replace with another ? I'm currently working on a css preprocessor projects and I would appreciate an

Re: [css-d] stand-down

> David Laakso wrote: >> Dawn will arrive soon enough. > > And I can't wait. > > >> In the meantime, your comments and suggestions -- thus far -- are always >> welcome. >> >> Best, >> Westmoreland >> > > I get a blank page using IE7 but shows up in FF.

Re: [css-d] stand-down

At 10:43 PM -0400 7/21/09, David Laakso wrote: >Dawn will arrive soon enough. >In the meantime, your comments and suggestions -- thus far -- are always >welcome. > >Best, >Westmoreland > David : As always, looks great. Functionality concern. To revie

Re: [css-d] stand-down

David Laakso wrote: > Dawn will arrive soon enough. And I can't wait. > In the meantime, your comments and suggestions -- thus far -- are always > welcome. > > Best, > Westmoreland > David, I fell someone confined and restricted with the line. Le

Re: [css-d] stand-down

Ron Zisman wrote: > > >> Dawn will arrive soon enough. >> In the meantime, your comments and suggestions -- thus far -- are always >> welcome. > > sometimes the dawn never comes. > > comments from a "print designer" so consider the source... > > --the toad in ny > > Open, honest, direct, and spe

Re: [css-d] My menu - finally centered but doesn't look good in other browsers than Firefox...

Andzia wrote: > two browsers are better than one ;) One old (and I do mean OLD) trick is to have your CSS browser specific. Not particularly elegant... but it could give a better user experience to more people. Just a suggestion... -- The generation that took acid to escape reality is now

Re: [css-d] My menu - finally centered but doesn't look good in other browsers than Firefox...

Well, I removed the call for menu from footer.php and now it doesn't double, and I removed width: 100% from .menu and .nav and .footer, and now only IE has some trouble with displaying bacground under the menu, while Opera doesn't show the footer but it looks good in Firefox and Safari so I'm q