I don't understand what the validator is telling me.
My css:
div#header {
position: relative;
width: 100%;
height: 90px;
background: white url(../images/cont-bl.gif) bottom left no-repeat;
z-index: 0;
margin-bottom: 15px;
}
What jigsaw says:
83 div#header
It may want you to have everything in the exact order. For the
background shorthand the technically correct order would be:
background: #fff url('../images/cont-bl.gif') no-repeat bottom left.
So it may have arrived at your position properties and assumed that
was the end and didn't expect any
Nope. The order in this case is ignored. Even the color value is
regognized as a valid CSS 2.1 color value.
If all browsers apply the rule, then the validator is wrong. Token
order in shorthand notation is not so fixed.
Please report this problem to the validator maintainers. Maybe
something
I'm not sure what's going on when you run the validator, but your CSS
entered into Jigsaw's direct input form correctly reports that your CSS is
valid CSS 2.1 and/or CSS 3.
I don't understand what the validator is telling me.
My css:
div#header {
position: relative;
width: 100%;
http://www.copywritecolombia.com/index3.html
Thank-you David that has sorted out the dropping divs. In firefox and ie
the white centre div wrapper which contains the footer now seems to go
right to the bottom of the page. If I change the text size +2 then the
design doesn't break which is great.
On Mon, 15 Feb 2010, e...@copywritecolombia.com wrote:
http://www.copywritecolombia.com/index3.html
Thank-you David that has sorted out the dropping divs. In firefox and ie
the white centre div wrapper which contains the footer now seems to go
right to the bottom of the page. If I change
e...@copywritecolombia.com wrote:
http://www.copywritecolombia.com/index3.html
Thank-you David that has sorted out the dropping divs. In firefox and ie
the white centre div wrapper which contains the footer now seems to go
right to the bottom of the page. If I change the text size +2 then
Chris F.A. Johnson wrote:
On Mon, 15 Feb 2010, e...@copywritecolombia.com wrote:
http://www.copywritecolombia.com/index3.html
Thank-you David that has sorted out the dropping divs. In firefox and ie
the white centre div wrapper which contains the footer now seems to go
right to the
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 07:40:00PM +0100, Gabriele Romanato wrote:
Nope. The order in this case is ignored.
That's what I've always thought. However, in this case putting the
repeat factor before the positions cleared the problem, even though, as
another poster pointed out, direct entry of that
Rick Pasotto wrote:
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 07:40:00PM +0100, Gabriele Romanato wrote:
Nope. The order in this case is ignored.
That's what I've always thought. However, in this case putting the
repeat factor before the positions cleared the problem, even though, as
another poster pointed
Ed wrote:
If I change the text size +2 then the
design doesn't break which is great. However if I get rid of styles then
it does break. What -if any-solution exists? Thanks
David wrote:
If the style sheet for any page on the Web is deleted or disabled then
the the page is displayed as simple
e...@copywritecolombia.com wrote:
Yes if you turn off the css then and just have the simple html as
long as you read it then that is correctly formatted? My question is
if there any way I can make this html better?
We usually don't deal with HTML as such here on css-d. We focus on CSS
e...@copywritecolombia.com wrote:
David wrote:
If the style sheet for any page on the Web is deleted or disabled then
the the page is displayed as simple html markup. Or, is it that I just
do not understand your question?
Best,
~d
Ed replied:
Yes if you turn off the css then and just
13 matches
Mail list logo
