Re: [css-d] Anchor offset ?

On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 7:56 PM, Ed Seedhouse wrote: > On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 1:39 PM,   wrote: >> On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Ed Seedhouse wrote: >>> On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 10:22 AM,   wrote: Yes, Frames without frames is exactly what I want. > >>> The "standard" way to achieve this is w

Re: [css-d] Anchor offset ?

> >>> Yes, Frames without frames is exactly what I want. > > >> The "standard" way to achieve this is with some kind of server-side > >> processing, such as ASP, PHP, "server side includes" or several > other > >> methods. > > > I think maybe you missed something, I am not wanting to use frames >

Re: [css-d] Anchor offset ?

Ed Seedhouse wrote: > On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 1:39 PM, wrote: >> On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Ed Seedhouse wrote: >>> On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 10:22 AM, wrote: Yes, Frames without frames is exactly what I want. > >>> The "standard" way to achieve this is with some kind of server-side >>>

Re: [css-d] Anchor offset ?

On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 1:39 PM, wrote: > On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Ed Seedhouse wrote: >> On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 10:22 AM,   wrote: >>> Yes, Frames without frames is exactly what I want. >> The "standard" way to achieve this is with some kind of server-side >> processing, such as ASP, PHP

Re: [css-d] Anchor offset ?

On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Ed Seedhouse wrote: > On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 10:22 AM,   wrote: >> Yes, Frames without frames is exactly what I want. > > The "standard" way to achieve this is with some kind of server-side > processing, such as ASP, PHP, "server side includes" or several other > me

Re: [css-d] Anchor offset ?

On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Thierry Koblentz wrote: >> >> I believe what the OP is after is to achieve the same behavior as if >> the >> >> banner/header was a top frame. >> >> -- >> >> Regards, >> >> Thierry >> > >> > Whoops. Then perhaps these will give him some ideas to play with... >> >

Re: [css-d] "position:fixed" and the spec: is that a miss?

> > Section 9.4.1 [1] does not say that fixed positioned elements > establish a > > new block formatting context. > > > > Is that a miss? > > Is it another case of "fieldset"? (not in the spec as a "nbfc" > trigger but > > always implemented that way). > > Or is there another reason I'm missing? >

Re: [css-d] "position:fixed" and the spec: is that a miss?

On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 7:40 PM, Thierry Koblentz wrote: > Section 9.4.1 [1] does not say that fixed positioned elements establish a > new block formatting context. > > Is that a miss? > Is it another case of "fieldset"? (not in the spec as a "nbfc" trigger but > always implemented that way). > Or

Re: [css-d] Anchor offset ?

> >> I believe what the OP is after is to achieve the same behavior as if > the > >> banner/header was a top frame. > >> -- > >> Regards, > >> Thierry > > > > Whoops. Then perhaps these will give him some ideas to play with... > > > >

Re: [css-d] Anchor offset ?

On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 10:22 AM, wrote: > Yes, Frames without frames is exactly what I want. The "standard" way to achieve this is with some kind of server-side processing, such as ASP, PHP, "server side includes" or several other methods. It can be done with pure html/css at the expense of hav

[css-d] "position:fixed" and the spec: is that a miss?

Section 9.4.1 [1] does not say that fixed positioned elements establish a new block formatting context. Is that a miss? Is it another case of "fieldset"? (not in the spec as a "nbfc" trigger but always implemented that way). Or is there another reason I'm missing? I know that CSS3 spec [2] incl

Re: [css-d] Anchor offset ?

>> I believe what the OP is after is to achieve the same behavior as if the >> banner/header was a top frame. >> -- >> Regards, >> Thierry > > Whoops. Then perhaps these will give him some ideas to play with... > > Yes, Fram

Re: [css-d] Anchor offset ?

Thierry Koblentz wrote: >> genericmailli...@gmail.com wrote: >> >>> http://webpages.charter.net/jlgates/sample.html >>> >> >> > David, > > I believe what the OP is after is to achieve the same behavior as if the > banner/header was a top frame. > > -- > Regards,

Re: [css-d] Anchor offset ?

> genericmailli...@gmail.com wrote: > > > >> > >>> I have not been able to find a solution to my problem. > >>> > >> Or, yet better, a > >> clickable link to the actual page in question. > >> > >> > >> > > http://webpages.charter.net/jlgates/sample.html > > > I hope this is what you are after...

Re: [css-d] Anchor offset ?

genericmailli...@gmail.com wrote: > >> >>> I have not been able to find a solution to my problem. >>> >> Or, yet better, a >> clickable link to the actual page in question. >> >> >> > http://webpages.charter.net/jlgates/sample.html > > I hope this is what you are after.

Re: [css-d] need another pair of eyes..

Hi All Thanks for all the replies. I seem to have everything lining up properly now in Firefox and IE Bryan __ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://c