Hi, which browsers render my test case correctly?
http://cim.szm.com/stretch-over-cell.html
Thank you.
Michal Cizmazia
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ --
On 9/20/10 5:31 AM, Michal Čizmazia wrote:
Hi, which browsers render my test case correctly?
http://cim.szm.com/stretch-over-cell.html
Thank you.
Michal Cizmazia
On Mac OS X 10.4.11
Pass
Opera/10.62
Fail
Camino/2.0.3
Safari/4.1.2
WebKit nightly trunk 63031 [crashes browser]
SeaMonkey/2.
Wow, thank you David,
is the specification clear in this case? Is there a way how can I
stretch the nested span over a table cell in all browsers?
The test case:
- http://jsfiddle.net/Vwg7T/
- http://cim.szm.com/stretch-over-cell.html
Michal Cizmazia
On 9/20/10 6:46 AM, Michal Čizmazia wrote:
Wow, thank you David,
is the specification clear in this case? Is there a way how can I
stretch the nested span over a table cell in all browsers?
The test case:
- http://jsfiddle.net/Vwg7T/
- http://cim.szm.com/stretch-over-cell.html
Michal Cizma
On Sep 20, 2010, at 7:46 PM, Michal Čizmazia wrote:
> is the specification clear in this case? Is there a way how can I
> stretch the nested span over a table cell in all browsers?
>
> The test case:
> - http://jsfiddle.net/Vwg7T/
> - http://cim.szm.com/stretch-over-cell.html
quote from the spe
Thanks Philippe,
your test case works for me.
Your quote from the specification seemed to be related to the
relatively positioned element itself. I use relative positioning just
to create a containing block:
"If the element has 'position: absolute', the containing block is
established by the near
On Sep 20, 2010, at 9:24 PM, Michal Čizmazia wrote:
> Your quote from the specification seemed to be related to the
> relatively positioned element itself. I use relative positioning just
> to create a containing block:
well you apply position relative to the table-cell. What happens in that cas
OK, but what you've "drawn" (posted) is not what you are trying
to achieve, but what you can already achieve but which does not
match your needs. What I (and perhaps others) need to see is
what you are trying to achieve visually; we know from your
prose description the intended effect, but not ho
Tod,
It seems that when you make the height of the too small there isn't
room for the scrollbar. This simple hack might give you some ideas:
select { height: 1.5em; }
select:focus { height: 3em; }
You can also use Javascript to achieve a similar effect.
I tried playing around with this
It's a while since I did a 3 column layout, and while looking around a
couple of sites (Alex Robinson's onetruelayout and Matthew James
Taylor's) I realised that most of this information is 4-5 years old.
Which of the gotchas are still valid in latest versions? (I recall not
using onetruelayout ori
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 9:32 PM, Dilip Nagle wrote:
> *The Problem:*
>
> At present, I use following css to achieve above; This CSS is
> then associated with gridview.header of the gridview
>
>
>
> .gvFixedHeader_Aqua{position:relative;
>
> top:expression(this.parentNode.parentNode.parentNode.pa
I would say that Mathew James Taylor's 3-col holy grail layout is the way to
go. He updated them last year I believe, so they're not all that old. On a site
I am working on I am using a modified version of his 3col theory in a
responisive layout with percentage-based widths. Works like a charm.
Hi,
I have no idea what property i need to accomplish the following. If anyone
can point me in the right direction i can then go and look it up.
I have footer div which has a background image.
Question 1: To get the background image to display i needed to add width and
height values. Is that corr
You can easily add a margin on the tag within the footer to push the
text down the page to where you need it to be.
The height and width you added are NOT for your background image but
rather for the DIV you are assigning it to. Otherwise that div will only
grow as large as your content, the cop
> "You can easily add a margin on the tag within the footer to push the
> text down the page to where you need it to be."
>
Never thought of that. Thanks, that's an easy solution.
But going back to my original question. Is there an actual property to
accomplish it, like you can have vertical-alig
Classing the div as display:table-cell would allow the vertical-align to
operate -- and does not necessarily require that it be enclosed in table-rows
or a table.
--
On 9/21/10 at 7:27 AM +0700, Lisa Frost wrote in a message entitled
"Re: [css-d] property for aligning vertical t
16 matches
Mail list logo