Re: [css-d] CSS3 animations - enter the matrix

2011-04-16 Thread tedd
At 1:25 AM +1000 4/17/11, Alan Gresley wrote: Moving on, the demo. http://css-3d.org/enter-the-matrix.htm Mondo kewl. Cheers, tedd -- --- http://sperling.com/ __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-

Re: [css-d] CSS3 animations - enter the matrix

2011-04-16 Thread David Hucklesby
On 4/16/11 8:58 AM, Gabriele Romanato wrote: This is awesome! :-) On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Alan Gresley wrote: http://css-3d.org/enter-the-matrix.htm I will in future put demos of this nature on this domain. http://css-3d.org/ I agree with Gabriele. It reminds me of time spent i

Re: [css-d] problem with "overflow: visible" under IE8 resizing the containing node

2011-04-16 Thread David Hucklesby
On 4/16/11 4:55 AM, Michael Adams wrote: On Saturday 16 April 2011 16:19, David Hucklesby wrote: [snip] Without a DOCTYPE, browsers are in quirks mode. Real browsers still obey CSS rules except for a couple of things like box sizing. All versions of IE will behave like IE 5.5 though. If you wan

Re: [css-d] CSS3 animations - enter the matrix

2011-04-16 Thread Gabriele Romanato
This is awesome! :-) On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Alan Gresley wrote: > Hello all, > > > I have for years been smashing down barriers concerning CSS. This may have > been on this mailing list or on www-style (CSS WG). I came into this realm > of human endeavor just when CSS3 was starting to

[css-d] CSS3 animations - enter the matrix

2011-04-16 Thread Alan Gresley
Hello all, I have for years been smashing down barriers concerning CSS. This may have been on this mailing list or on www-style (CSS WG). I came into this realm of human endeavor just when CSS3 was starting to be implemented by Safari 2 or 3 (back in 2008). My early CSS was an attempt at cre

[css-d] Dynamic CSS with animation was(Re: Reflection effect)

2011-04-16 Thread Alan Gresley
On 16/04/2011 11:39 PM, Barney Carroll wrote: Alan, a few points to make in response to your post, with inherently dynamic CSS in mind: On 16 April 2011 13:55, Alan Gresley wrote: Another question is what else is possible with CSS? I presume some would believe that CSS animation with a little

Re: [css-d] Reflection effect

2011-04-16 Thread tedd
At 6:44 PM +0200 4/15/11, Gabriele Romanato wrote: Again, what's the purpose of CSS3? Having fun with CSS: http://onwebdev.blogspot.com/2011/04/pure-css-reflection-effect.html The purpose of having fun with CSS is testing, the purpose of CSS testing is make something of your spare time during

Re: [css-d] Reflection effect

2011-04-16 Thread Barney Carroll
Alan, a few points to make in response to your post, with inherently dynamic CSS in mind: On 16 April 2011 13:55, Alan Gresley wrote: > Another question is what else is possible with CSS? I presume some would > believe that CSS animation with a little JS is outright abuse of CSS. I sympathise wi

Re: [css-d] Reflection effect

2011-04-16 Thread Barney Carroll
On 16 April 2011 08:38, Gabriele Romanato wrote: > The potential of these new CSS3 features is so vast that you never stop > finding new solutions. :-) …new solutions to your OSX desktop in DHTML perhaps? Chucking this in for the dock items could be a laugh: li { -webkit-box-reflect: be

Re: [css-d] Reflection effect

2011-04-16 Thread Alan Gresley
On 16/04/2011 10:08 PM, Ingo Chao wrote: Am Samstag, 16. April 2011 schrieb Philippe Wittenbergh: On Apr 16, 2011, at 4:13 AM, Kevin A. Cameron wrote: This raises an interesting question: the reflected text in HTML or CSS? I'd argue that the reflection is decoration and only decoration, and

Re: [css-d] Reflection effect

2011-04-16 Thread Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd)
Ingo Chao wrote: Some hate the effect [1], therefore, it is decoration. Some hate "coz", "gonna" and "'fess up", but they are still (sadly) only too often a part of the content :-( Philip Taylor __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.

Re: [css-d] Reflection effect

2011-04-16 Thread Ingo Chao
Am Samstag, 16. April 2011 schrieb Philippe Wittenbergh : > > On Apr 16, 2011, at 4:13 AM, Kevin A. Cameron wrote: > >> This raises an interesting question: the reflected text in HTML or CSS? > > I'd argue that the reflection is decoration and only decoration, and thus > part of the stylesheet. >

Re: [css-d] problem with "overflow: visible" under IE8 resizing the containing node

2011-04-16 Thread Michael Adams
On Saturday 16 April 2011 16:19, David Hucklesby wrote: [snip] > Without a DOCTYPE, browsers are in quirks mode. Real browsers still obey > CSS rules except for a couple of things like box sizing. All versions of > IE will behave like IE 5.5 though. > > If you want to keep browsers in quirks mode,

Re: [css-d] Reflection effect

2011-04-16 Thread Philippe Wittenbergh
On Apr 16, 2011, at 4:13 AM, Kevin A. Cameron wrote: > This raises an interesting question: the reflected text in HTML or CSS? I'd argue that the reflection is decoration and only decoration, and thus part of the stylesheet. On Apr 16, 2011, at 3:16 AM, Tim Climis wrote: > Really, to get the

Re: [css-d] Reflection effect

2011-04-16 Thread Gabriele Romanato
Thanks guys! I have to make some further tests, actually. The potential of these new CSS3 features is so vast that you never stop finding new solutions. :-) http://www.css-zibaldone.com/ http://www.css-zibaldone.com/test/ (English) http://www.css-zibaldone.com/articles/ (English) http://onwebdev.b