Re: [css-d] CSS Via Conditional Comments for Safari?

2011-12-24 Thread Barney Carroll
Hiya Elli, I see 4 obvious ways out to the problem. You may feel uncomfortable with all of them but they could help you get a conceptual grip on how to deal with the situation as a thought exercise. 1) Install FontForge (open source and free to use), open up the font in question, and through a

Re: [css-d] CSS Via Conditional Comments for Safari?

2011-12-24 Thread Philip TAYLOR
Barney Carroll wrote: I am incredibly pretentious ;) You think you really have to tell us that, having already written : there are no credible user personas who fire up Windows and Mac to make sure their experience of a site has bitmap parity ???! :-) Philip Taylor

Re: [css-d] CSS Via Conditional Comments for Safari?

2011-12-24 Thread david
Philip TAYLOR wrote: Barney Carroll wrote: I am incredibly pretentious ;) You think you really have to tell us that, having already written : there are no credible user personas who fire up Windows and Mac to make sure their experience of a site has bitmap parity ???! :-) I just though

Re: [css-d] CSS Via Conditional Comments for Safari?

2011-12-24 Thread David Laakso
On 12/24/2011 3:20 PM, david wrote: Philip TAYLOR wrote: Barney Carroll wrote: I am incredibly pretentious ;) You think you really have to tell us that, having already written : there are no credible user personas who fire up Windows and Mac to make sure their experience of a site has bit

Re: [css-d] CSS Via Conditional Comments for Safari?

2011-12-24 Thread Elli Vizcaino
> Hiya Elli, > > I see 4 obvious ways out to the problem. You may feel uncomfortable with all > of > them but they could help you get a conceptual grip on how to deal with the > situation as a thought exercise > 4) Accept that font-rendering APIs will always differ, and that there is only >

Re: [css-d] CSS Via Conditional Comments for Safari?

2011-12-24 Thread Elli Vizcaino
> That's nice. How dose that help OP? And if the OP is not concerned about it, > now... just why did she write about it in the first place? In my estimation > the > font in question remains a real-world problem and ignoring that issue for a > reason that happens to be convenient at the moment