On 04/23/2012 10:56 AM, John D wrote:
I know that in some cases this not possible, but if someone
reports issues with IE, I'd politely ask whether they have tried
late versions of Firefox or Chrome :-)
Yes but Ie8 is still widely used in XP systems and about 48% of the
people are still using
Forgot to add: when I can, I do what the original email here suggested. But
that is mostly for private and non-commercial work. Still - would be good
to know how many corporate browsers are IE.
W dniu 24 kwietnia 2012 10:28 użytkownik Tomasz Borek <
tomasz.bo...@gmail.com> napisał:
> My employer
My employer (offers mostly HR software) last December dropped support of
IE6.
pozdrawiam,
Tomasz Borek
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-disc
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 16:11:58 +0100, Ellen Herzfeld wrote:
My previous message points to the wrong file without the media queries :
it should be
http://qd.xlii.org/2012/content_modules-ie8.html
By the way, I checked without selectivizr and it doesn't change the
problem.
Ellen
Both this
On 23 Apr 2012, at 17:43, Tom Livingston wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Ellen Herzfeld wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I am trying to use respond.js for media queries. My first tests went fine
>>> in ie7/8.
>>>
>>> But I am now stumped by a problem in both ie7 and ie8 although it seems
>>> wo
On 24 Apr 2012, at 11:49, Duncan Hill wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 16:11:58 +0100, Ellen Herzfeld wrote:
>
>> My previous message points to the wrong file without the media queries : it
>> should be
>>
>> http://qd.xlii.org/2012/content_modules-ie8.html
>>
>> By the way, I checked without se
I'm retired. You've made it all come back.
> FWIW, my employer (large insurance company) recently upgraded it's
> official corporate browser ... from IE6 to IE7. What is this IE8 you
> speak of? ;-)
>
--
GPG/PGP public key: B07F9AAE
_
How do you get rid of a background image or multiple background images in
resolutions for handheld less then 768?
Thanks
Carol
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wi
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Carol Swinehart
wrote:
> How do you get rid of a background image or multiple background images in
> resolutions for handheld less then 768?
>
> Thanks
>
> Carol
With no other info, I'll suggest using background-image: none;
A link showing your problem is prefe
Why should we get rid of a piece of design when you have a CSS3 property
for that? Use background-size. It works. :-)
On Tuesday, April 24, 2012, Carol Swinehart
wrote:
> How do you get rid of a background image or multiple background images in
> resolutions for handheld less then 768?
>
> Thanks
> Why should we get rid of a piece of design when you have a CSS3 property
> for that? Use background-size. It works. :-)
I would advocate setting it to background-image: none, because you save some
bandwidth and cache for the small device.
Rob Emenecker @ Hai
Hello,
Could anyone point me towards an example of an evenly split
multi-column (4+) fluid layout?
I have a fixed-width container that varies its width using media
queries... I would like to see if I can put a row with multiple
columns inside this container and have the row/columns expand to fit
Le Apr 25, 2012 à 3:14 AM, Carol Swinehart a écrit :
> How do you get rid of a background image or multiple background images in
> resolutions for handheld less then 768?
Only specify background images for devices / or better - windows / wider than
768px ?
div { background: lime; }
@media all
At 23:41 +0200 on 04/24/2012, Gabriele Romanato wrote about Re:
[css-d] Responsive Design Issue:
Why should we get rid of a piece of design when you have a CSS3 property
for that? Use background-size. It works.
Maybe since use of background-size assumes/requires that the device's
browser sup
14 matches
Mail list logo
