On 09/02/2014 20:53, David Hucklesby wrote:
On 2/9/14, 12:11 PM, Chris Rockwell wrote:
Interesting Chris. I'v always styled the with margins,
positioning, sometimes padding...etc and it always has an effect. But have
you applied colors, images to that? This pen shows what I'm referring to (and
>
>
> Backgrounds on root elements are special :)
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-background/#special-backgrounds
Perfect - thanks for the link Jon!
--
Chris Rockwell
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-di
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 3:53 PM, David Hucklesby wrote:
> I believe that's because backgrounds on propagate to the viewport -
> that's the root () element. Unless, that is, you have a background
> specified for .
>
Backgrounds on root elements are special :)
http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-background
Sure, check out
http://codepen.io/search?q=tag&limit=all&order=popularity&depth=everything&show_forks=falsefor
some ideas
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 4:02 PM, John Johnson wrote:
> if you picture a store tag..a rectangle with a hole at one end for the
> string, and that end's corners each snipped of
if you picture a store tag..a rectangle with a hole at one end for the string,
and that end’s corners each snipped off at appx 45 degrees..
can CSS handle something like that, or would I be better of turning to HTML5
canvas?
Thank you
John
__
That did it, so is this reverse cascading :)?
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 3:53 PM, David Hucklesby wrote:
> On 2/9/14, 12:11 PM, Chris Rockwell wrote:
>
>> Interesting Chris. I'v always styled the with margins,
>>> positioning, sometimes padding...etc and it always has an effect. But
>> have
>
On 2/9/14, 12:11 PM, Chris Rockwell wrote:
Interesting Chris. I'v always styled the with margins,
positioning, sometimes padding...etc and it always has an effect. But have
you applied colors, images to that? This pen shows what I'm referring to (and
I've never experienced because of my mark-up
Thanks Chris, and others.
I'd agree about the 'wrapper'. It just happens I was rather throwing a page together for my menu
tests, and slipped the background image onto the body. I've moved it now (in my local version
only) to my 'wrapper', which is div#outer, and that works too, and looks much
>> Interesting Chris. I'v always styled the with margins,
positioning, sometimes padding...etc and it always has an effect.
But have you applied colors, images to that? This pen shows what I'm
referring to (and I've never experienced because of my mark-up
conventions): http://codepen.io/anon/pen/f
Interesting Chris. I'v always styled the with margins, positioning,
sometimes padding...etc and it always has an effect.
Rachel, Tim will need to give his element a position of absolute, relative (and
maybe fixed but I'm sure about that one) for z-index to kick in.
Eric
> On February 9, 2014 at
oThis has never come up for me, so I can't explain (yet) why this happens,
but it appears, at least in Chrome, that some style attributes don't honor
widths, margins, [and other things I don't know of] of the body element.
The reason this has never come up for me, is that I would always use a
wrap
Hi - I think you have to give it a position and include a z-index
instruction to tell it to put the image at the "back", eg
background-attachment: fixed;
background-position: 50% 60px;
margin: 30px 0px 0px 0px;
z-index: 1;
}
That, above, is taken from a very old style sheet;
I've been playing around with a few menu design ideas, and mocked up a site to try them out. The
menus are OK as far as they go, but I'm having trouble with a background image.
I have been trying to set up a background image in the (or in ), but
when I do so it appears outside the body, as if
13 matches
Mail list logo
