Hello all, can you shed any light on how to fix a FOUC on our homepages?
http://www.xifin.com
http://www.xifin.com/radiology (maybe not bad?)
Thanks in advance!
--
J.C. Berry, M.A.
UI Developer
619.306.1712(m)
jcharlesbe...@gmail.com
http://www.mindarc.com
I would be more inclined to try to help if you glossed "FOUC" rather
than requiring me (and perhaps others) to research it for myself
(theirselves).
Philip Taylor
J.C. Berry wrote:
Hello all, can you shed any light on how to fix a FOUC on our homepages?
http://www.xifin.com
http://ww
Flash Of Unstyled Content. Man I haven't heard about that in years.
Have you tried Googling for solutions? I'm bombarded by hundreds of links
all describing methods that can help.
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Philip Taylor wrote:
> I would be more inclined to try to help if you glossed "FOU
I was not aware Reese that this problem no longer exists in web dev...?
I have read on various fixes, but I think this is peculiar to my specific
case.
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Ryan Reese
wrote:
> Flash Of Unstyled Content. Man I haven't heard about that in years.
>
> Have you tried Go
I was not aware either. I had to remember what FOUC was since I hadn't
heard of that term in years.
I was sure that this issue is not around today. Granted, I couldn't get the
issue to appear on my end.
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 1:46 PM, J.C. Berry wrote:
> I was not aware Reese that this problem
Sorry, you did a double negative. I misunderstood.
AFAIK this problem no longer exists but there are still articles on this
which give solutions. I suggest you google some.
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 1:46 PM, J.C. Berry wrote:
> I was not aware Reese that this problem no longer exists in web dev.
In trying to learn CSS I just came across this term a few months ago in
Charles Wyke-Smith's "Stylin' With CSS." On page 241 (2nd ed) he says "you
need a link to the style page in the head of the page to prevent this from
happening." He says "if a link tag or a script tag (used to associate
JavaS
I was reading and realized that may not be the correct terminology... no
wonder the comments about an older problem. When I said flash of unstyled
content, in my particular case I meant that the homepage banners on these
pages
http://www.xifin.com
http://www.xifin.com/radiology
and the video carou
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 2:09 PM J.C. Berry wrote:
> I was reading and realized that may not be the correct terminology... no
> wonder the comments about an older problem. When I said flash of unstyled
> content, in my particular case I meant that the homepage banners on these
> pages
> http://www
Hi, FOUC is as good a name as any.
The problem is that your slides need to be set to display: none in your
CSS. This issue is happening because the JavaScript must load and be parsed
before it can set the display to none. This takes just long enough for this
flash. CSS, on the other hand, must all
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 3:33 PM Tom Livingston wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 2:09 PM J.C. Berry
> wrote:
>
>> I was reading and realized that may not be the correct terminology... no
>> wonder the comments about an older problem. When I said flash of unstyled
>> content, in my particular case
You have some very good sized images and a boatload of JS -- they take
time to load.
One idea would be to look into whatever carousel you are using and see if
they offer a "lazy loading" option. Where it will pull in the image only
on demand, and not preload them at all beforehand. Can make th
Please see below:
On 3/20/15 12:34 PM, Chad Lundgren wrote:
Hi, FOUC is as good a name as any.
The problem is that your slides need to be set to display: none in your
CSS. This issue is happening because the JavaScript must load and be parsed
before it can set the display to none. This takes ju
13 matches
Mail list logo
