Try a gif image with black and transparent instead of a png image. Gifs can
have a transparent background.
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 2:57 PM, Crest Christopher <
crestchristop...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I want to make a background-image within a pesudo-element; where as, where
> the image is black, the
If you add a bg image to a container, it will be its actual size UNLESS you
add styles that effect its size. Cover, contain, background-size:100% auto;
and the like will effect the size of the bg img.
If you want to see the entire bg img at its actual size the container needs
to be the same dimens
Sounds like your bg img is as big as its container. Makes sense. I'm really
not understanding what you want.
On Friday, May 22, 2015, Crest Christopher
wrote:
> Background-size: 100% auto, scales the background image smaller. If I add
> to the element width: the size of the background image
> i
Background-size: 100% auto, scales the background image smaller. If I
add to the element width: the size of the background
image is perfect, in other words, the exact results I want. Is it
recommended to add width, unless you are using a positioning for the
element ?
No other background-siz
I want to make a background-image within a pesudo-element; where as,
where the image is black, the background image stops.
background-image:url("acme.png");
mask-image:url("maskout.png") alpha;
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-
Philip Taylor schreef op 22-05-15 om 10:59:
No. In simpler words, as the widths of the individual columns add to
exactly 100%, it is not at all clear to me when one or more of those
columns might appear /underneath/ another column rather than alongside
(ignoring rounding issues). Talking abou
Erik Visser wrote:
> Philip Taylor schreef op 22-05-15 om 10:28:
>
>> Given that the latter three add to exactly 100%, and ignoring rounding
>> issues, in what circumstances (if any) would you expect them to exploit
>> their floatability ?
>
> I am not a native English speaker. (guess you alre
Philip Taylor schreef op 22-05-15 om 10:28:
Given that the latter three add to exactly 100%, and ignoring rounding
issues, in what circumstances (if any) would you expect them to exploit
their floatability ?
I am not a native English speaker. (guess yoiu already noticesd)
So to be shure. If i
Erik Visser wrote:
> The current main structure is 3 columns (percentage based) in a wrapper.
> Completed with a header and footer. Main css for the columns:
>
> #wrap{width:100%; height:auto; float:left; margin:1.25rem 0 1rem 0;}
> #left{width:20%; height:auto; float:left; margin:0 0 0 0.6rem;
Georg schreef op 21-05-15 om 17:46:
You do not have to make your page responsive on wide screens, in order
to make it fit narrow screens. I suggest you manipulate the original
design through a series of mediaqueries, to make it work on narrower
screens.
That is: a "mobile last" approach that ma
10 matches
Mail list logo
