Re: [css-d] It is now clear

On Jun 8, 2015, at 5:28 AM, Tom Livingston wrote: > > > On Sunday, June 7, 2015, Karl DeSaulniers wrote: > On Jun 7, 2015, at 8:48 PM, Tom Livingston wrote: > > > On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 9:19 PM, Karl DeSaulniers > > wrote: > >> Ok, sorry if this is spam, It has become clear to me what the

Re: [css-d] Z-Index with Fixed/Absolute Elements in IE

Hey Guys, I probably should have been more specific. The element I was positioning absolute was an iframe youtube video. In IE this is a known issue and adding "?wmode=opaque" to the URL resolves this issue. Here is the stack overflow link in case anyone is interested: http://stackoverflow.com

Re: [css-d] Z-Index with Fixed/Absolute Elements in IE

On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 3:14 PM, Roger Blanton wrote: > Hello, > > I have a header that is postion fixed similar to the CSS below: > > header { > position: fixed; > width: 1100px; > left: 50%; > margin-left: -550px; > z-index:999; > } > > .absolute-element { > position: absolute; > top: 0; > left:

[css-d] Z-Index with Fixed/Absolute Elements in IE

Hello, I have a header that is postion fixed similar to the CSS below: header { position: fixed; width: 1100px; left: 50%; margin-left: -550px; z-index:999; } .absolute-element { position: absolute; top: 0; left: 0; bottom: 0; width: 100%; height: 100%; } In all browsers other than IE these beh

Re: [css-d] It is now clear

On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 10:07 AM, Crest Christopher < crestchristop...@gmail.com> wrote: > I was thinking this was irrelevant in the present. The page(s) main > container must have contained within the borders of the main container of > the page the following ? > > > > > > > I do not understan

Re: [css-d] It is now clear

I was thinking this was irrelevant in the present. The page(s) main container must have contained within the borders of the main container of the page the following ? Tom Livingston Monday, June 08, 2015 6:28 AM Odd. A link would help. Karl DeSaulniers

Re: [css-d] It is now clear

On Sunday, June 7, 2015, Karl DeSaulniers wrote: > On Jun 7, 2015, at 8:48 PM, Tom Livingston > wrote: > > > On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 9:19 PM, Karl DeSaulniers > wrote: > >> Ok, sorry if this is spam, It has become clear to me what the.. > >> > >>