Perfectly. Thanks. Makes sense. And I'll take "close" as a personal
accomplishment no matter how far it really was. :-).
On Saturday, August 8, 2015, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
>
> > On Aug 8, 2015, at 22:36, Tom Livingston > wrote:
> >
> > Because 100% couldn't be calculated because the paren
> On Aug 8, 2015, at 22:36, Tom Livingston wrote:
>
> Because 100% couldn't be calculated because the parent was a percentage?
> '100% of what' kind of thing?
Close… :-)
The physical parent's width is known and can be computed, no problem (parent in
the source; in this case the ``); in “norma
Because 100% couldn't be calculated because the parent was a percentage?
'100% of what' kind of thing?
On Saturday, August 8, 2015, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
>
> > On Aug 8, 2015, at 01:13, Tom Livingston > wrote:
> >
> > OK, well after some more poking around, width: inherit; on the 'a'
>
> On Aug 8, 2015, at 01:13, Tom Livingston wrote:
>
> OK, well after some more poking around, width: inherit; on the 'a'
> fixed my issue. Thanks if you looked…
But do you know / understand why ?
– it is a good thinking exercise in the summer heat :-)
Correct answer wins a cookie and a glass
> On Aug 8, 2015, at 15:10, Martin Skjöldebrand wrote:
>
> As can be seen here: www.tyresoschack.se there is an overlay image that seeks
> to explain how to get the menu on the site. It's only displayed on the first
> visit.
>
> ….
>
> However as you can see the image is centered on the page
