i've been using negative absolute positioning on text that i want
hidden, but need to be accessible to alternate devices. someone has
suggested that the text won't be seen by bots (like google) so it
won't be processed and can't be utilized for SEO purposes. in your
experience is this true?
On Oct 1, 2007, at 4:37 PM, Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
Brian Campbell wrote:
> Can someone tell me why there's an extra 3px or so of padding at
> the bottom of the parent DIV...and only in FF?
Same in all Gecko on windows. Looks like the non-floated ul is given a
margin-bottom.
>
I'm only seeing this issue in FireFox (Mac & PC)...
I have the following markup:
Tab 1
Tab 2
Tab 3
And the following related CSS:
* {
padding:0;
margin:0;
}
.tableTabs {
float:left;
padd
On Friday, September 21, 2007, at 10:42AM, "Bruno Fassino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>On 9/21/07, Brian Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm having issues with (seemingly random, although I'm sure it's not) block
>> level
>>
I'm having issues with (seemingly random, although I'm sure it's not) block
level elements claiming 100% width even when width:auto is set. Didn't have
much luck finding the solution via google or in the wiki so I thought I'd post
it. Any suggestions?
thanks,
Brian
_
I *KNOW* if seen the solution to this somewhere before. I think i
may have even used that solution at one point. However, i'm not
finding it anywhere. I've set a background image to some link
elements. Some of these elements are set to change on hover, others
are not. However ALL of them
