not semantic (although it could arguably be an
).
Thanks for the alternate approach!
--
Curtis Clark
Cal Poly Pomona
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ
long
I was pleased that adding a right padding with width in pixels could
increment a div with a width in percent (first time I've understood why
the box model is as it is). But is this the best approach? We'll be
feeding IE 6 and below a different stylesheet.
--
Cur
me cases, that might be superior, since you could put more that one
image side-by-side in a cell without floating them.
--
Curtis Clark http://www.csupomona.edu/~jcclark/
Director, I&IT Web Development +1 909 979 6371
University Web C
___
> css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
> List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
> List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
> Supported by evolt.o
que to feed
unstyled or lightly-styled content to the vanishingly small base of NN4
users.
--
Curtis Clark http://www.csupomona.edu/~jcclark/
Director, I&IT Web Development +1 909 979 6371
University Web
Francesco said the following on 2005-05-07 17:28:
Sure, I know they are for accessiblity, but I'm asking what does Google
do with them. I know it must use them somehow for its Image Search.
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=google+image+search+optimize&btnG=Google+Search
--