Yes! There is a hack for this, and it is a lifesaver.
One main problem I have with 7.1 and below is that they misinterpret
the correct parent when absolutely positioning a child within a
relatively positioned box - the absolutely positioned box goes to the
grandparent instead of the parent. NN7.2
The page is here: http://fpdev/fp.aspx?st=2182e=productpid=34783
This site just went live. The bug isn't activated on hover, it happens
when you click-drag the links without following them. Only in IE, of
course.
To see the bug: Alternatively click-drag the logo in the top left
corner and the
I'm a moron. Here's the link:
http://www.fisher-price.com/fp.aspx?st=2182e=productpid=34783
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub --
@Christian: * html #selector { } is NOT seen by IE7. However, they
haven't got all the bugs out, so conditional comments are going to be
necessary - I'm still seeing whitespace between li items, which I
had been fixing with a * html li { height: 1%; }...now that doesn't
work.
@Felix: downloading
I've run into this before. I think I've fixed it before, but I can't
remember, and I apparently can't think of the right search terms to
find out if anyone else has solved this problem. I can't post anything
live, but here is the HTML and CSS I'm using.
Basically, I have two floated block links,
Check out http://www.fisher-price.com/fp.aspx?st=30e=toysbytype
On initial load in my brand-spankin-new Firefox 1.5, the page is the
correct length. However, on refresh, it becomes 32767px tall.
Could someone who understands the One True Layout and Firefox better
than I apparently do tell me
WHY WOULD IE 6 COPY THE LAST TWO CHARACTERS in the last DIV on a new line??? I
mean, it's html code, why would the browser REPEAT IT TWICE?
My guess is that it is the !--/div-- comments that you have after
the div closes. This happened to me once.
I can't tell you WHY ie does this; and it
If you make the gradient a little wider, it won't be a big bandwidth
hit but it will allow the browser to draw the screen faster (it only
has to draw a 10px image 100 times, but it has to repeat a 1px image
1000 times, for example).
Your padding adds to the widths you have declared - padding (except in
IE in quirks mode) is not part of the declared box width. So, a 70%
box with 5% padding added is really 80%. Adjust your sizes and padding
so that their total is 99%, and you will be fine.
Also, FWIW, I'd consider adjusting
We've soft-launched a new site template. It's at
http://www.fisher-price.com/fp.aspx?st=30e=toysbytype
It's largely standards-compliant, with a few problems beyond my
control with a legacy javascript piece and xslt unable to write input
/ tags. But I can live with it. Compare to the rest of the
The page is left aligned
which makes it look like a lot of wasted space on the right; it may 'feel'
better if its centred but I'm no design guru!
Yes, this is a standards remake of an existing site look-and-feel, and
the main FP site is fixed-width, 770px, left-aligned. So, this site
can't be
Bobby van der Sluis's script is an improvement over Geoff's Flash
Object, IMO. See bobbyvandersluis.com/ufo/.
On 11/21/05, Jim Berkey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Check out Geoff Stearns Flash Object - with a javascript file you can insert
your flash into a div, and put whatever text /links you
Unfortunately (for us at least, as I prefer plain text email as well)
there's data that suggests that click-thru rates are much higher with
HTML email...in the case of selling toys, we get to put images in the
email, with nice beveled (*hehe*) see it in action demo buttons, and
the various product
Unless you don't have a client, use tables. In the end, the client
isn't going to accept that 20% of the audience might see a plain text
email instead of the pictures. At Fisher-Price, I'm working for
standards as much as possible, and I initially talked to the email guy
about CSS, but I've really
You're displaying your ul as a list-item itself. You don't really
mean to do that, you actually just want the lis inside of the ul
to be list items. Take that instruction out of .list in your style
sheet and you're good to go.
On 10/19/05, 2geedesign [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When viewing the
OK...I'm working on a CSS flyout menu, and running into strange
problems with Opera. No other engine has problems I haven't been able
to work around, but Opera is just not painting part of the flyout. I'm
not going to able to attach a screenshot, but if you've got Opera 7/8
and can take a look,
This is a JavaScript issue, not CSS. You would have to have multiple
divs, one for each thumbnail, and show and hide them depending on what
thumbnail is clicked. Write me privately if you want more direction on
how to do this.
__
questions about these, and I'll respond when I'm
not at work.
On 9/21/05, Kristina Floyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eric Shepherd wrote:
Also, there's no relationship right now between your top nav bar and
the subnav - if the subnav is related to HOME, for example, it should
be a nested list (ideally
Kristina wrote:
I'm concerned that i've got listitis!! What I mean is, I think I've
gone from div-itis to li-stitis.
Kristina: I think much of the content on your page is lists. However,
the Venue Detail is not really a list. I would suggest that this
information is really a definition
of past technologies.
Eric Shepherd
Buffalo, New York
www.arkitrave.com/log/
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org
You have nothing set on the li elements to tell them to stack
horizontally. You set display: inline-block on the ul, but the items
inside the ul will stack as normal, which is vertically.
Setting the display property on the ul will force it to sit
horizontally with other block-level elements
The problem with that is, of course, that it is a very nice font, and
italic, and substituting plain text would seriously degrade the
graphic design. That said, what exactly do you need sliding doors for
if you are using a graphic which is already presized?
On 9/9/05, CJ Larson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't see any problems in Opera that aren't in Firefox. Your drop
shadows aren't quite working consistently, which you probably already
know (specifically, the right side, badge bottom area and all along
the right edge of the document). Your grays are two different colors,
giving you a line
I don't have a live example of this, so I'll try to keep it simple and
general. I run into Netscape 7 bugs quite often, as it has serious
issues with background positioning and also the following scenario:
I have a list of products, each with an image. They are in separate
dls, given a width, and
24 matches
Mail list logo
