I am trying to come up with a solution for a diagonal line using HTML
and CSS. I rely on javascript as a solution for this predicament.
I have tried the following items:
- Basic SVG with given width/height such as the following:
http://www.w3.org/2000/svg";>
This approach works, but Inte
I have already created an input element of type submit as follows
input type="submit" alt="Next" class="next_button"
That has the following styles applied:
.next_button {
background:transparent url(next.jpg) no-repeat scroll 0 0;
border:none;
height:34px;
width:70px;
color:transparent;
font-siz
I have a page using an unordered list with a custom list style image. This
works fine until I set the child li elements to use display: inline; at
which point the list style image disappears.I have tried adding margins
and padding, but neither seems to help. Will I need to add a background
im
Georg is right about having to wait for major browsers to catch up.
You may also wish to take a look at:
http://code.google.com/p/curved-corner/
It does not work in Opera (not even 10.20 alpha), but in all the other
browsers I have tested on various platforms.
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 2:01 PM, Ch
I disagree. The idea that using display: table-cell does not seem to
be any more semantically correct than simply placing the element in a
table cell according to the W3C
(http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/tables.html#value-def-table-cell):
table-cell (In HTML: TD, TH)
Specifies that an eleme
If I am vertically aligning an element it seems that the only way to
consistently do so with standard css is to implement a "display:
table-cell; vertical-align: middle;" style on the container.
Is there any benefit this affords me over just creating a table? I
seems odd to me that the new hero f
(that is to say that the text contained
therein [rather than wrapping as it does in other browsers] forces the
cell, and therefore table to expand beyond the set boundaries of the
parent dom element).
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Jack Blankenships
wrote:
> After experimenting some more I h
s, etc.?
Thanks,
Jack
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
> Jack Blankenships wrote:
>>
>> Apparently there was a table there as well, and max-width does not apply
>> to a table very nicely in Safari or Internet Explorer. Can anyone offer
>> some more e
Apparently there was a table there as well, and max-width does not
apply to a table very nicely in Safari or Internet Explorer. Can
anyone offer some more explanation on this?
Thanks,
Jack
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 9:50 AM, Jack Blankenships
wrote:
> Apparently there was a table there as w
Is there a way to get a max-width attribute to work in Safari and
Internet Explorer? Supposedly both browsers suppourt it, but I can't
find an example of either doing so.
In theory I would like to add a class to a div like so:
.container {
width:100%;
max-width: 960px;
}
I would
Using display: inline-block seems to work for now, but I am wondering
what circumstances may cause that to fail.
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 3:40 PM, Jack Blankenships
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://mylittletestsite.com/same_dynamic_width.html
>
> In theory the first section
http://mylittletestsite.com/same_dynamic_width.html
In theory the first section should have the header stop at 800px. The
second should stop at 400px for both the header and the content.
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 3:23 PM, Gunlaug Sørtun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jack Blankensh
Any suggestions on how to make two items have the same dynamic width?
For example, if I have two divs with one being a header and a second
with content. I want to make the header div expand to fill the same
width as the content div.
I have tried enclosing both in a parent div and giving the con
not allow for using the tab key
to move between links (which incidentally seems like an accessibility
flaw).
I will try some experiments using the visibility attribute rather than
the display attribute.
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 6:38 PM, David Hucklesby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 8
Gunlaug Sørtun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jack Blankenships wrote:
>>
>> I want to make it so that an active link makes the parent element
>> disappear. The element does disappear when I place an :active pseudo-class
>> on the parent element to change the display
I want to make it so that an active link makes the parent element
disappear. The element does disappear when I place an :active
pseudo-class on the parent element to change the display to none,
however the link ceases to function (i.e. - clicking on it does
nothing).
Working example: http://www.c
Any ideas on how to have an element's overflow property apply to some
children but not to others?
For example, I have a div that contains a table/grid that I want to
have set to overflow: auto on a specific height. This way the results
stay within a specific set of dimensions and do not push the
> because this sounds like the same arrangement.
>
>
>
> - Original Message - From: "Jack Blankenships"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Monday, October 06, 2008 4:19 PM
> Subject: [css-d] CSS Select Box
>
>
>> I am building a pseudo-
Apparently the problem was the application of the z-index property to
the ul element rather than the li element.
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 10:17 AM, Jack Blankenships
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please see the example at http://cssprovingground.com. The bottom one
> works fine because
I am building a pseudo-"select" with css to allow for
submenus/subselects, i.e. when an element with sub options is hovered,
another set of options appears to the right. With the provided css
and sample HTML below this functionality works just fine, however when
I place this into rows of a table f
: 100%; max-width: 100%; border: none;
position: absolute; top: 0px; left: 0px;}
...
Any other suggestions?
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 10:47 AM, Gunlaug Sørtun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jack Blankenships wrote:
> > I am trying to apply a max-width and min-width featur
I am trying to apply a max-width and min-width feature to a page for
IE6, but all of the examples I see online appear like this:
(see: http://www.antix.co.uk/code/css/imposing_minimum_width/default.htm)
#example_3 .main
{
min-width:450px;
/* IE Dynamic Expression to set the width */
problem and been able to find a javascript
solution that uses as much css as possible?
On Jan 25, 2008 5:34 PM, Stephan Wehner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 25, 2008 10:42 AM, Jack Blankenships
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have been reading some articles
> &
I have been reading some articles
(http://www.alistapart.com/articles/elastic/ ,
http://www.htmldog.com/articles/elasticdesign/demo/ ,
http://www.antix.co.uk/code/css/imposing_minimum_width/example_3.htm ,
etc), but I am not finding the answer I am looking for.
I want to have an image (several ima
24 matches
Mail list logo