ements and "ul.classname label" for LABEL
elements...)
Quite straightforward.
Cheers,
jens
--
Jens Brueckmann
http://www.yalf.de
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/F
a certain way.
Thus, putting the class attribute in the UL element is far easier than
putting it on each INPUT element you want to style.
Cheers,
jens
--
Jens Brueckmann
http://www.yalf.de
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROT
-CSS2/cascade.html )
Cheers,
jens
--
Jens Brueckmann
http://www.yalf.de
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://c
Hi Rachel,
no problem here with IE6. Images were displayed on first page loading.
Cheers,
jens
--
Jens Brueckmann
http://www.yalf.de
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List
ong.
If you would add something like
p {
max-width: 60em;
margin: 1.5em auto;
line-height: 1.6em;
}
to your CSS, the page becomes far more readable (at least for me).
Cheers,
jens
--
Jens Brueckmann
http://www.yalf.de
__
> "thin" is not an attribute for border
Quite right, is is an allowed value for the border-width property, see:
http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/box.html#value-def-border-width
Cheers,
jens
--
Jens Brueckmann
http:
he same case as Olivier Thereaux and Jens
Meiert discussed on www-validator-css.
Why the WDT submits the cached pages instead of referencing the online
pages I do not know. However, apparently the validator team are
working on the validator's issue with lo
local, if that helps.
Rick, are you sure, you checked the page online, because the error
states it cannot retrieve a local file:
file://localhost/MeyerReset.css
This is a known issue with the CSS validator, see:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-validator-css/2007Oct/0027.html
Cheers,
jens
the referenced file returns a 404 error:
http://sandbox.sharkattack.co.uk/novaRebuild/css/print.css
Cheers,
jens
--
Jens Brueckmann
http://www.yalf.de
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/cs
first letter, e.g.:
ol li:first-letter { padding: 0 0 0 1em;}
Cheers,
jens
--
Jens Brueckmann
http://www.yalf.de
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-d
Hi Brian,
why would you not set the dark blue background on the div itsself?
Cheers,
jens
--
Jens Brueckmann
http://www.yalf.de
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ
in California.
I acquired my first French Bulldog...
CSS:
.inline
{
display: inline;
}
You might want to adjust font size and font weight as well:
.inline
{
display: inline;
font-size: 1em;
font-weight: normal;
}
That should work as intended.
Cheers,
jens
--
Jens
or: yellow;}
with this markup:
aaa
bbb
ccc
ddd
I get the following result for IE6SP1, Firefox 2.006 and Opera 9.23 alike:
1. p: blue
2. p: red
3. p: yellow
4. p: yellow
So it seems to work at least in these three browsers (on Windows2000)
Cheers,
jens
--
Jens Brueckmann
,
jens
--
Jens Brueckmann
http://www.yalf.de
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css
a solution to the problem can be found at
http://tanny.ica.com/ICA/TKO/tkoblog.nsf/dx/Select-tag-overlap-in-IE
Cheers,
jens
--
Jens Brueckmann
http://www.yalf.de
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/ma
just for fun but for accessibility.
Cheers,
jens
--
Jens Brueckmann
http://www.yalf.de
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
Hi John,
>
>
> shows at the top of the page on a white line.
adding a space after the first two dashes and before the second double
dashes should solve your problem.
Cheers,
jens
--
Jens Brueckmann
http://ww
On 30/03/07, Jukka K. Korpela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you use the shortcuts _only_, you are limiting yourself to
> 256 colors, which often isn't very restrictive but doesn't mean
> actual benefits either.
Actually 16×16×16 = 4096 colours are possible.
Cheers,
Hi Rob,
> No problem, it gets even weirder in IE aswell, they have a display rule
> called 'inline-block' (!?) which is nowhere in the w3c spec.
I would like to draw your attention to the following:
http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/visuren.html#value-def-inline-block
Cheers,
jens
--
Hi Barney,
> I have this tree:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi
>
>
>
>
>
please keep in mind that the CODE element is an inline element which
should not contain other block elements like DIV, UL, LI.
Cheers,
jens
nd may cause problems:
Please use the following instead:
Cheers,
jens
--
Jens Brueckmann
http://www.yalf.de
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-
ox the page is abysmally long.
Removing the following three properties from #navbox corrects these issues:
margin-bottom: -32767px;
padding-bottom: 32767px;
overflow: hidden;
Cheers & Happy New Year!
jens
--
Jens Brueckmann
page-box:
#content .homepage-box
When in doubt about the meaning of certain selectors you will
certainly find the Selectoracle quite useful:
http://gallery.theopalgroup.com/selectoracle/
Cheers,
jens
--
Jens Brueckmann
http://www.yalf.de
__
l remains.
Cheers,
jens
--
Jens Brueckmann
http://www.yalf.de
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki
to 1.2/0.7, which is approximately 1.71:
.adblock h2 em { /* AdType */
font-size : 0.7em;
font-style: normal;
text-transform: uppercase;
display : block;
float : left;
width : 100px; /* image width */
line-height : 1.71em;
}
(and remember to put the
end tags of the LI elements after the end tag of the P elements like
such:
What Every School Attorney Needs to Know About Sovereign Immunity
Jerry Brant, Withers, Brant, Igo & Mullenix,
PC
The advantage of this approach becomes immediately visible if you view
s
in IE, but setting the position property of the H1 heading to
relative, resolves this issue:
#contentMain h1
{
position: relative;
}
Hope that helps.
Cheers,
jens
--
Jens Brueckmann
http://www.yalf.de
__
css-discus
ongst others,
performance issues:
http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/appendix/notes.html#notes-tables
Cheers,
--
Jens Brueckmann
http://www.yalf.de
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
Li
28 matches
Mail list logo